Thread: Rate these webdesigns
View Single Post
Unread 3 Jan 2006, 20:38   #9
s|k
Caveat Lector
 
s|k's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Tucson, Arizona
Posts: 3,038
s|k has ascended to a higher existance and no longer needs rep points to prove the size of his e-penis.s|k has ascended to a higher existance and no longer needs rep points to prove the size of his e-penis.s|k has ascended to a higher existance and no longer needs rep points to prove the size of his e-penis.s|k has ascended to a higher existance and no longer needs rep points to prove the size of his e-penis.s|k has ascended to a higher existance and no longer needs rep points to prove the size of his e-penis.s|k has ascended to a higher existance and no longer needs rep points to prove the size of his e-penis.s|k has ascended to a higher existance and no longer needs rep points to prove the size of his e-penis.s|k has ascended to a higher existance and no longer needs rep points to prove the size of his e-penis.s|k has ascended to a higher existance and no longer needs rep points to prove the size of his e-penis.s|k has ascended to a higher existance and no longer needs rep points to prove the size of his e-penis.s|k has ascended to a higher existance and no longer needs rep points to prove the size of his e-penis.
Re: Rate these webdesigns
Quote:
Originally Posted by SYMM
And slightly off topic: to whoever it was in the last threat that said embedded flash couldn't be done while sticking to W3C standards, you were wrong.
Unless they changed something in the last year or so since I've checked, the required code to embed a flash object always fails W3C standards. There are some hacks, like using an Iframe, but that's cheating.
__________________
Diomedes IRC
Blog
Last edited by s|k; 3 Jan 2006 at 20:41. Reason: spelling
s|k is offline   Reply With Quote