View Single Post
Unread 29 Sep 2010, 09:06   #58
Paisley
The brother of Spammer
 
Paisley's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Paisley - Scotland
Posts: 2,352
Paisley is a glorious beacon of lightPaisley is a glorious beacon of lightPaisley is a glorious beacon of lightPaisley is a glorious beacon of lightPaisley is a glorious beacon of lightPaisley is a glorious beacon of light
Re: Alliance Size for next round

Quote:
Originally Posted by neroon View Post
ps: also i totally agree that seeing ND1, ND2, ND3 tags competeing wouldn`t be anything bad.. let em def each othre with +1 eta and its fine.. it also would create competition even between themselves.
I am totally against this idea the main reason being it would create a heavy fi/co universe to negate the possibility of receiving out of tag defense on your attack.

http://www.clawofdarkness.com/pawiki/index.php/Round_31

"This round was marked by the dominance of a few particular ship types, primarily Cathaar fighters and Xandathrii fighter/corvette fleets, with frigate and destroyer anti-cr/bs def fleets. Ascendancy and xVx were almost entirely fi/co to start off. Other alliances specialised even further with SPOON going totally Xan fi/co and DLR being almost purely Cath fi."

also having tags 2 and 3 are potentally open to abuse from "support planets"
I personally call them cheating B@$t@rds and I dont trust the MH ability to police this effectively... and would prefer to keep the status quo with the
"Defending a planet out of your galaxy in an alliance not yours is forbidden."
__________________
Missing Subh (r15-r18)
Paisley is offline   Reply With Quote