Thread: G to the De-tox
View Single Post
Unread 30 Jul 2008, 03:32   #42
horn
Registered User
 
horn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 115
horn has ascended to a higher existance and no longer needs rep points to prove the size of his e-penis.horn has ascended to a higher existance and no longer needs rep points to prove the size of his e-penis.horn has ascended to a higher existance and no longer needs rep points to prove the size of his e-penis.horn has ascended to a higher existance and no longer needs rep points to prove the size of his e-penis.horn has ascended to a higher existance and no longer needs rep points to prove the size of his e-penis.horn has ascended to a higher existance and no longer needs rep points to prove the size of his e-penis.horn has ascended to a higher existance and no longer needs rep points to prove the size of his e-penis.horn has ascended to a higher existance and no longer needs rep points to prove the size of his e-penis.horn has ascended to a higher existance and no longer needs rep points to prove the size of his e-penis.horn has ascended to a higher existance and no longer needs rep points to prove the size of his e-penis.horn has ascended to a higher existance and no longer needs rep points to prove the size of his e-penis.
Re: G to the De-tox

Quote:
Originally Posted by Prover View Post
How is it possible not to categorize at some point? If you give no meaning to the term pluralism (which is itself a category), then I would say reductionism is really the endless deconstruction of ideas (that you are exhibiting).
needing to categorise things at some point is not a justification for you conflating all aspects of art as a creation of love. nor anything else you've posted so far.

Quote:
Originally Posted by prover
Again, you avoid some of my earlier remarks on this account.
I might be ignoring "remarks", but i'm not ignoring any points. If you can find some that have to do with what we're (i'm?) talking about then please repost them. i must have missed them.


Quote:
Originally Posted by prover
You haven't exhibited any attempt to give meaning to my statements with your destructive tendency.
i've asked you to define and clarify words/sentences that to 3D people, appear to not make sense. you aren't doing it.

Quote:
Originally Posted by prover
Meaning is essentially a subjective idea. I'm in the middle of trying to 'define' it, can you not see? I would suggest, rather than nit-picking points and stretching out this thread too long, you synthesize a response into a complete paragraph. (To meet me halfway here). That's how people begin to understand things.
i honestly don't understand what you're saying. i've tried asking you to define certain parts to understand, but you aren't answering the questions.

Quote:
Originally Posted by prover
If you were at all familiar with quantum mechanics, you would know about its subjective nature given that light behaves as both a wave and a particle. That duality (I like to call it a paradox) is at the physical limits for advancement in science, so probability is used (as 4D-thinking)
Here is a list of what you have so far represented as the fourth dimension at different points during this thread:

-time
-a synthesis of love/truth/god
-probability

do you understand how ****ing stupid this is?

Quote:
Originally Posted by prover
to bridge this gap in describing nature. (This is also relevantly adopted by meteorologists who are coming to terms with chaos theory in weather predictions). When we go beyond this paradox, we get into purely theoretical grounds. You might escape this paradox by invoking super-strings and a many-worlds hypothesis (so to be physically "objective"), but I would say that that's an infinite reduction in itself, where as my hypothesis is more of a regression. What makes your reduction any better than my more-so regressive approach? Looking in retrospect (at history), we see that our understanding has come from a combination of both these techniques.
yeah you've lost me again. are you suggesting that because of quantum mechanics it seems as though some events are random? if so, ok. but i don't see how that supports any of the other crap you've been talking about.
horn is offline   Reply With Quote