Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Boogster
I have no real idea how precedent is set: do the presiding judge's comments have no influence upon later cases? In any case, stop being a big gay pedant, ignore the word 'legal', and address the point.
|
In a remarkably stupid move Boogster responds to allegations that he is homophobic with ... er ... homophobia.
Another brilliant coup!!!
The only 'point' to address is that nothing you said was correct:
"the legal distinction between child-producing couples and otherwise" - There is no distinction, legal or otherwise, between child producing and non-child producing couples.
"is the most significant thing to come out of this" - Nothing has 'come out' of this case.
But hey! Here's an idea, why don't you go on posting meaningless shit and pretending that you weren't wrong.