View Single Post
Unread 2 Feb 2005, 23:50   #188
1-X
overtired
 
1-X's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 5,900
1-X has ascended to a higher existance and no longer needs rep points to prove the size of his e-penis.1-X has ascended to a higher existance and no longer needs rep points to prove the size of his e-penis.1-X has ascended to a higher existance and no longer needs rep points to prove the size of his e-penis.1-X has ascended to a higher existance and no longer needs rep points to prove the size of his e-penis.1-X has ascended to a higher existance and no longer needs rep points to prove the size of his e-penis.1-X has ascended to a higher existance and no longer needs rep points to prove the size of his e-penis.1-X has ascended to a higher existance and no longer needs rep points to prove the size of his e-penis.1-X has ascended to a higher existance and no longer needs rep points to prove the size of his e-penis.1-X has ascended to a higher existance and no longer needs rep points to prove the size of his e-penis.1-X has ascended to a higher existance and no longer needs rep points to prove the size of his e-penis.1-X has ascended to a higher existance and no longer needs rep points to prove the size of his e-penis.
Re: [football] the big league 2005

non-predictors JonnyBGood, Inferno, Belgarath all lose 0-1

Code:
[Arsenal]      Phang v F-Focus    [Man Utd]
a 1-1		  h 2-4		        2-1
giggs 13	vieira 09	    
					
             Phang 0 - 0 FF

[Bolton]       Peace v Blasto   [Tottenham]
d 2-2		  d 3-1		      a 0-1
g'opoulos 3	 diouf 50	   defoe 23
H
             Peace 1 - 0 Blastoderm

[Charlton]   Apothos v FF       [Liverpool]
d 2-1		h 1-2		        2-1		
el kark 33	bartlett 20	    		

           Apothos 0 - 0 FF 

[Portsmouth]  lokken v midge5  [Middlesbro]
a 0-3		  d 2-1		      a 1-2
h'baink 13	christie 35	 h'baink 28

            lokken 0 - 0 midge5

[West Brom]    Lupin v Non-Human [C-Palace]
h 2-0		  d 2-2	              d 0-0
campbell 35     johnson 48	 johnson 25
					HAS
             Lupin 0 - 4 Non.Human
Code:
[Birmingham]    rr_0 v 1-X    [Southampton]
d 2-1		  h 2-1		      h 1-0
heskey 50	Pandiani 12	anderton 40
X				         HA
        roadrunner 3 - 3 1-X

[Blackburn]       JC v SYMM       [Chelsea]
a 1-1	 	  a 0-1		      a 0-2
duff 17		 robben 05	  robben 23
H					SHG
                JC 1 - 3 SYMM

[Everton]        LHC v Stew       [Norwich]
h 2-0		  d 1-0		      h 2-0
beattie 40	ferguson 79	 beattie 34
G					  G
               LHC 1 - 1 Stew

[Fulham]        Koen v MrL_JaKiri [A-Villa]
d 1-0		  d 1-1		      d 2-1
cj 60		angel 55       boa morte 40
H					  H
              Koen 1 - 1 MrL 

[Man City]   Zharkov v Kurashima[Newcastle]
h 1-1		  a 1-1		      d 1-2
swp 21	        shearer 10	 shearer 18
X					  S
           Zharkov 3 - 1 Kurashima
Code:
             P W D L  F  A Pts
SYMM         5 3 1 1  8  3 10
Peace        5 3 1 1  5  1 10
Zharkov      5 3 0 2 10  6  9
-----------------------------
roadrunner   5 2 3 0  9  7  9
Phang        5 2 3 0  7  5  9
1-X          5 2 2 1  9  8  8
Blastoderm   5 2 2 1  6  3  8
Apothos      5 2 1 2  8  5  7
Kurashima    5 2 0 3  8 11  6
JC           5 2 0 3  6  5  6
midge5       5 1 3 1  3  3  6
NonHuman     5 1 2 2  9  9  5
Koen         5 1 2 2  8  8  5
Lokken       5 1 2 2  5  9  5
Stew         5 1 2 2  4 10  5
LHC          5 1 2 2  2  4  5
Belgy        5 1 1 3  6  7  4
JonnyBGood   5 1 1 3  6  9  4
-----------------------------
MrL_JaKiri   5 0 2 3  6 11  2
Inferno      5 0 2 3  0  3  2
Lupin        5 0 1 4  3 12  1
something I have to mention as I can't decide whether to implement it or not...

Remember the "completely wrong" rule idea? If two players draw and neither has gained any points from the final score (ie GAX) then if a player has part of the score correct regardless of the result, he/she gets a decider point.

It hadn't happened yet afaik but there are two in this weeks results. If the rule is applied, MrL would win rather than draw, and Phang would lose rather than draw. (because MrL correctly predicted Villa to score 1, and Football Focus correctly predicted Arsenal to score 2)

I want opinions based on fairness/what's good for the league and not on who will benefit today. (If the rule is implemented, I'll go back through all the old results to see if I've missed applying it before)

Last edited by 1-X; 3 Feb 2005 at 01:30.
1-X is offline   Reply With Quote