Quote:
Originally Posted by .Disc.
I played back then, and back then there wasnt alliance limits, at the end of the day, Denial had 75 members, thats 75 defence fleets, with 4/5/6 alliances attacking, each with 2 roid fleets, thats 900 attack fleets.
900 attack fleets
75 defence fleets
obviously these nare sketchy numbers, but u get the idea  |
This is just plain wrong; numerous reasons already posted on the thread but I'll just add its pretty insulting to those who have taken on far worse situations.
Anyway, on to the topic of the thread. There is only one objective measure of alliance performance: score. It's what is defined by the game and it is the only measure. Denial live and die by this record and it objectively makes them the best alliance.
However, the question many have had and indeed many used to debate is whether score is even accurate, regardless of its fairness. A big alliance can be large but powerless, ignored by better alliances. The greatness of an alliance can be measured by military force or political power. These are all subjective terms but they might give us a far more accurate picture of which alliance is the best rather than an objective one.