View Single Post
Unread 26 Jul 2011, 13:31   #20
Clouds
Registered User
 
Clouds's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 1,386
Clouds is a splendid one to beholdClouds is a splendid one to beholdClouds is a splendid one to beholdClouds is a splendid one to beholdClouds is a splendid one to beholdClouds is a splendid one to beholdClouds is a splendid one to behold
Re: xVx and Nap agreements

It is a general rule (in my opinion) that if two alliances have a no aggression pact to honor a 48 hour cooling off period if either alliance chooses to end the agreement. Whether alliance a was involved in talks to participate in the raping of alliance b is irreverent because there was no agreement not hit alliance b.

The truth of the matter is xVx broke the agreement and attacked CT within the 48 hour cooling off period.

Whether you're HC'ing for xVx in future rounds is also irrelevant, CoolKat, because you still acted on behalf of the xVx alliance, and xVx will find it difficult (dependable on each alliance) to enter in to NAPs with other alliances in future rounds due to their corruptness from the current round.

The main plausible reason why there is a 'gang bang' operation on xVx is because Apprime stated at the beginning of the round they they were 'gifting' xVx the win, and the block doesn't want Apprime to claim victory.

Quote:
Originally Posted by coolkat View Post
xVx didnt do anything wrong, You broke nap to plot against us, and were plotting against us WHILE we were napped. You also refused to help us on many occasions after we helped you...
CT didn't break the 'no attack pact' agreement. A no attack pact means that either alliance is not allowed to launch on the other. If the agreement went further, for example, coordinate attacks and/or work with together for the remainder of the round, then yes, GM would have been in the wrong.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Influence View Post
ohh comeon CT, if you really want to fight for #1 and break off your nap, at least be a man about it. You guys wanted #1, and saw an opportunity for it by ending your nap and blocking against xVx. Consequence of it is you pissed off xVx and that will now bite you in the ass, and i hope ppl will learn from this and will never trust CT again.
Firstly, Influence, You've changed sides when there is only a week left of the round and you shouldn't be allowed to comment on the situation. And to comment on what you described about trust, "i hope ppl will learn from this and will never trust CT again.", well more like folk will learn not to trust xVx in future rounds if they don't honor a 48 hour cooling off period.

CT didn't do anything wrong. They honored the agreement and were honoring the 48 hour cooling off period.

Politics change frequently in this game and of course certain alliances will end agreements with other alliances. Honoring a cooling off period just shows integrity and shows they can honor agreements.
Clouds is offline   Reply With Quote