Thread: xVx - statement
View Single Post
Unread 30 May 2009, 16:18   #142
[ND]Byrney
Nobody
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: London
Posts: 178
[ND]Byrney is a splendid one to behold[ND]Byrney is a splendid one to behold[ND]Byrney is a splendid one to behold[ND]Byrney is a splendid one to behold[ND]Byrney is a splendid one to behold[ND]Byrney is a splendid one to behold[ND]Byrney is a splendid one to behold
Re: xVx - statement

You'd have to ask someone in Evolution but as far as I'm aware their land on carDi wasn't an error and was in fact deliberate to **** up his planet. Sure it might look stupid but who really cares. There is a considerable difference in them effectively giving up 6 weeks into a round (one they can realistically have no further impact on) and giving up in the first 2 weeks as I'm sure you can appreciate.

As for Ascendancy being a viable attacking force in first 400 ticks, yes that's fair enough. As I said though, going around bashing on BGs earlier would've just accelerated the formation of our anti-Ascendancy block and we'd have reached the tick 450 situation sooner.
[ND]Byrney is offline   Reply With Quote