Quote:
|
Originally Posted by milo
Er no that wasn't my point, you're changing this to 'fervour and passion' of the insurgency from the existence of the insurgency itself
|
No, he's not. He's pointed out several times that your referral to the existance of "the" insurgency is meaningless. I can say that there's people who hate and want to kill members of The Beatles, which is supported by, for example, a member of The Beatles being killed and armed intruders trying to attack others.
It doesn't mean that The Beatles Insurgency is some unified thing, it doesn't imply that it has the scale of the insurgency in Iraq. People act differently based upon their own motives. We're not talking about some giant herd of sheep who all act in the same way.
You say you're studying to be an economist: where? Why don't you know this?
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by milo
Your 'link' merely explains who is more likely to collaborate; the people however will always resist.
|
There is no unified "people". ANYWHERE.
The miners' riots in the 80's: that was hardly a nationwide thing, nigh on all the people involved were those it directly affected. I don't see many objections to anti-hunting laws being made on the streets of newcastle.
Are you trying to put forward a series of statements so meaningless and ludicrous just in order to see how far we'll continue to reply to them?