Re: Congratulations Ascendancy
Quote:
Originally Posted by Munkee
You cant talk about the lack of hierarchy etc ascendancy HAS become conventional other than their round 16 win the last 3 rounds they have turned against what the alliance was first set up for. The alternative to exi 1up rules and systems and the whole **** pa attitude is long gone imo. For you to say there is no hierarchy in asc is LOL... take a look at any of the joint channels with other alliances and theres always the same 3 or 4 asc in there. They are HC's whether you like to call them that or not, you have a hierarchy. The naps, no defence statuses etc etc all lead to asc just turning in to a skilled conventional alliance. IF they really didnt care crashers wouldn't get kicked right? looking shit wouldnt matter right? but its all a big issue now it seems! Well done tho guys, who knows it might all go complete circle for ya over the next few rounds.
|
The main difference is, if you want to be involved in all this stuff in asc, you will be. As such everyone has the options to be "hc" or "bc" of "dc", and tbh that works because most people prefer to only do these things 1-2 nights a week, when they feel like it. Conventional alliances will force people to do their "job", we have no such things
__________________
Golan - Ascendancy
Planets.
Zik: 3rd(r30), 4th(r52), 7th(r27), 9th(r26), 31st(r51)
Ter: 3rd(r50), 4th(r53), 4th(r37), 5th(r31) 7th (r58)
Xan: 3rd(r36), 40th(r57) 54th(r33), 104th(r29)
Cat: 8th (r54), 9th(r48), 12th (r55), 20th(r32), 77th(r23), 103rd(r38), 150th(r34), 152nd(r24),
Etd: 14th(r28)
Those damn emp races..
|