View Single Post
Unread 5 Oct 2010, 17:30   #147
Paisley
The brother of Spammer
 
Paisley's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Paisley - Scotland
Posts: 2,352
Paisley is a glorious beacon of lightPaisley is a glorious beacon of lightPaisley is a glorious beacon of lightPaisley is a glorious beacon of lightPaisley is a glorious beacon of lightPaisley is a glorious beacon of light
Re: Alliance Size for next round

Quote:
Originally Posted by neroon View Post
so called casual players have their alliances and so called hardcore players have their own alliances.. ppl get mixed in one way or the other and if they dont in some strange mystical way then whats wrong in having 5 alliances that are competing for top1 rather than 1 or max 2, like we have atm, and another 5 that are abit more behind?

once more.. we have far too few players to manage more than one or maximum two 80-100 player alliances.. and the bottom line is that this is BORING

ps: our basic top3 alliances are nd, asc, app and occasionaly someone new or "old new".. taking account last round, #1 alliance won over #2 with what 50mill score? #2 won over #3 by another 40mill score..

dont tell me that the tags are competitive enough these times to have a good and interesting round
I hear what you are saying there ... however
Is merger a such a dirty word for some smaller alliances?
__________________
Missing Subh (r15-r18)
Paisley is offline   Reply With Quote