Quote:
Originally Posted by JonnyBGood
Actually if you read my very last sentence in that thread, specifically the last clause, it's obvious I didn't and I just didn't want to meander into a very silly debate over morality. The fact that morality is a human construct doesn't actually mean anything. What else would you (not specifically you) expect it to be constructed by? The three bears?
|
I just don't see the point of your last fallacy beyond 'a silly debate over morality'. The ought-is fallacy seems nothing more than a mildly interesting Humesian oh-no-nothing-we-do-has-any-meaning statement. The naturalistic fallacy, of course, is essentially just a discussion of semantics, unless I've missed something.