Thread: Animal Rights
View Single Post
Unread 5 Aug 2006, 04:03   #58
Jennifer
Destroyer of Worlds
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 552
Jennifer is a pillar of this Internet societyJennifer is a pillar of this Internet societyJennifer is a pillar of this Internet societyJennifer is a pillar of this Internet societyJennifer is a pillar of this Internet societyJennifer is a pillar of this Internet societyJennifer is a pillar of this Internet societyJennifer is a pillar of this Internet societyJennifer is a pillar of this Internet societyJennifer is a pillar of this Internet societyJennifer is a pillar of this Internet society
Re: Animal Rights

Quote:
Originally Posted by neptis arcos
teknicly you are corect thay wer not real untill me invented them to make life a more hapy one and now thay are the law and animals do have right's
See my post on responsibilities. We do have a certain duty of care, within our society. But those 'rights' were extended by society, and can be taken away, and are not evidence that animals have intrinsic rights that we must respect.
Quote:
i personaly do not like rats but that dus not mean thay have no rights
That's not the reason that they don't have [intrinsic] rights, but the fact remains that they don't.
Quote:

no thats cald the law
Correct. But they are as I described them, and do not exist in the absence of society.
Quote:

thats cald your morals
Also correct. And as I said, they are not universal.
Quote:

neptis arcos
Nice to meet you.
__________________
“In spite of the roaring of the young lions at the Union, and the screaming of the rabbits in the home of the vivisect, in spite of Keble College, and the tramways, and the sporting prints, Oxford still remains the most beautiful thing in England, and nowhere else are life and art so exquisitely blended, so perfectly made one.”
Jennifer is offline   Reply With Quote