Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Dante Hicks
Given that children can include anything up to a 17 year old in some countries, yes I think it can be victimless.
And as I have discussed previously I do not think that downloading child pornography should be a crime. Obviously making it is another matter (although the vast majority of photographs of children naked are probably harmless family photos, so I guess that can be victimless too).
|
There is a difference between "barely legal" and primary school kids.
16 year olds can have legal sex and are at an age to understand what the deal is with it.
(Apparently some clever **** thought is was a good idea for you that you cant legally watch porn of the adult variety but you can shag the "School babe" at 16 years of age but thats a different story.)
6-8 year olds will see as an unplesant game of "doctors and nurses" which they wont understand. Which will leave them Confused in the best case senario. Absolutey destroyed in the mind being the worst case.
(Some even get murdered after the vile act.)
I bet you would be changing your tune is this was YOUR child/
brother/sister/cousin.