Thread: Round 20 Review
View Single Post
Unread 7 Mar 2007, 10:00   #47
Kal
Inactive peon
 
Kal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 6,050
Kal has a brilliant futureKal has a brilliant futureKal has a brilliant futureKal has a brilliant futureKal has a brilliant futureKal has a brilliant futureKal has a brilliant futureKal has a brilliant futureKal has a brilliant futureKal has a brilliant futureKal has a brilliant future
Re: Round 20 Review

Quote:
Originally Posted by NitinA
Clusters being too small at the moment can easily be solved by removing clusters and re-introducing paras. That way you aren't dependant on the number of clusters in the universe which is dynamic round-to-round, but upon the static 10 paralells.
There don't have to be 10 para's its a simple config change to have a different number. But there seems to be some debate over whether more galaxies in a "cluster" would be a good thing or not.

Quote:
Originally Posted by NitinA
Common sense dictates it be wiser to fix the problems of a round during the next upcoming round?
Yes and no, if problems are identified early enough then they can be fixed for the following round. But problems identified late can't allways be dealt with for the next round as it would mean changing the development plan in a signifcant way. For round 21 we are now really into the test phase all the key coding has been completed, so this is not the time to suddenly embark on a major change. If there are quick and easy things that can be done its not a problem, but anything that would require either significant coding or significant testing time cannot be done.
__________________
Kal

Round 6-10 NoS member-->NoS junior HC
Round 10.5 FAnG member
Round 11-15 PATeam
Round 17-30 PATeam
Round 31 ???

Check out toastmonster.com for crazy illustrations and art
Kal is offline   Reply With Quote