View Single Post
Unread 16 Mar 2009, 14:19   #59
[B5]Londo
Paso Leaute
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 919
[B5]Londo has much to be proud of[B5]Londo has much to be proud of[B5]Londo has much to be proud of[B5]Londo has much to be proud of[B5]Londo has much to be proud of[B5]Londo has much to be proud of[B5]Londo has much to be proud of[B5]Londo has much to be proud of[B5]Londo has much to be proud of
Re: Difference between Round 30 Alliances

Quote:
Originally Posted by ArcChas View Post
That may be the way that you do things, but in VGN a planet with insufficient def points gets no defence - whether it has 300 rocks or 3,000.
I didnt say we sent fleets to ppl who dont deserve it; we also had a floor below which def was not sent to planets; however by the very nature of DCing some ppl are net contributers and some are net leechers, add to this simple fact that big fat ppl get huge waves requiring relatively more def, their high roid counts are more worth defending, they are on more to provide i scans nag/help DCs or DC themselves and they attack more to become big automatically reducing the def they can send. Ergo it is a nonsense to talk about an alliance that does not flagship, it is only a matter of degree, and im afraid VGN is rather notorious (not so much as CT perhaps ), notoriety is simply the combined experience of the community.
__________________
An optimist may see a light where there is none, but why must the pessimist always run to blow it out?
[B5]Londo is offline   Reply With Quote