[Kaiba]

Originally Posted by BloodyButcher

Well i never said that i wanted any alliances to disband.
If it ends up with 2-3 alliances at 80 members, some at 60 members, and a few a 40 members that would aswell make the impact smaller allies that always says they arnt playing for the win can make on the top fight.

Lets say tag A and B fights for #1. Both 60 members.
Tag C is allied with tag A, and attacks tag B. Tag C is 50 members
Tag A and C attacks with 2 fleets each member, 220 fleets.
Tag B grounds, and 3 fleet defend and gets 1 gal def fleet each 5 member, 195 Def fleets total.
They have 25 fleets less than the A and C.

If tag A and B was both 80 members it would be different.
A and C combined would be 260 attack fleets combined, B would have 240 def fleets and with gal def 260 fleets for def total.
It would be a much more fair fight.

Why should small tags have so much power over bigger tags?

Right so what you are actually saying is you want raised tag.sixes because then you could recruit more dross and try and win by size rather than skill and political nous.