View Single Post
Unread 9 Jun 2017, 20:12   #126
BloodyButcher
Propaganda Chief
 
BloodyButcher's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Under the Rainbow
Posts: 4,740
BloodyButcher has much to be proud ofBloodyButcher has much to be proud ofBloodyButcher has much to be proud ofBloodyButcher has much to be proud ofBloodyButcher has much to be proud ofBloodyButcher has much to be proud ofBloodyButcher has much to be proud ofBloodyButcher has much to be proud ofBloodyButcher has much to be proud of
Re: R72 discussion thread

Quote:
Originally Posted by CBA View Post
Tbh the only thing that makes sense here is point 6. When only two alliances exist i can guarantee there will not be much napping going on.
Well i never said that i wanted any alliances to disband.
If it ends up with 2-3 alliances at 80 members, some at 60 members, and a few a 40 members that would aswell make the impact smaller allies that always says they arnt playing for the win can make on the top fight.

Lets say tag A and B fights for #1. Both 60 members.
Tag C is allied with tag A, and attacks tag B. Tag C is 50 members
Tag A and C attacks with 2 fleets each member, 220 fleets.
Tag B grounds, and 3 fleet defend and gets 1 gal def fleet each 5 member, 195 Def fleets total.
They have 25 fleets less than the A and C.

If tag A and B was both 80 members it would be different.
A and C combined would be 260 attack fleets combined, B would have 240 def fleets and with gal def 260 fleets for def total.
It would be a much more fair fight.

Why should small tags have so much power over bigger tags?
__________________
RainbowS

RB Ely MISTU Angel Fusi0n 1up ToF VisioN CT FAnG ROCK
BloodyButcher is offline   Reply With Quote