Planetarion Forums - View Single Post

Zotnam · 24 Jun 2009, 15:30

Meh, all changes seems to be going in the direction of punishing people even harder for getting roided. As a gal dc I hate that because it forces you to prioritize planets even earlier and makes it harder for those getting roided to come back. Which again will lead to more def whoring, which will lead to a huge gap between the top planets (those who are willing to def whore won't lose structures which is easily a 5% income loss on top of the roids).

I'm very much against punishing big planets for taking one for the team.

24 Jun 2009, 15:30	#131
Zotnam Over the moon Join Date: Aug 2001 Location: Deeeeenmark Posts: 547	Re: Should SKs be changed for R32? Meh, all changes seems to be going in the direction of punishing people even harder for getting roided. As a gal dc I hate that because it forces you to prioritize planets even earlier and makes it harder for those getting roided to come back. Which again will lead to more def whoring, which will lead to a huge gap between the top planets (those who are willing to def whore won't lose structures which is easily a 5% income loss on top of the roids). I'm very much against punishing big planets for taking one for the team. __________________ Golan - Ascendancy Planets. Zik: 3rd(r30), 4th(r52), 7th(r27), 9th(r26), 31st(r51) Ter: 3rd(r50), 4th(r53), 4th(r37), 5th(r31) 7th (r58) Xan: 3rd(r36), 40th(r57) 54th(r33), 104th(r29) Cat: 8th (r54), 9th(r48), 12th (r55), 20th(r32), 77th(r23), 103rd(r38), 150th(r34), 152nd(r24), Etd: 14th(r28) Those damn emp races..