Quote:
Originally Posted by Zotnam
If you want to start like any other alliance, don't come here complaining about other alliances doing the same, while having no idea about their overall goal/motivation. Unless there's a radical change in alliance size these bg's need to man up and run proper alliances again, after dlr's success last round everyone seems to be joining a bg to get an easier round. Personally I hope we roid all those ego players silly and make them realise bgs won't work in a normal round (r30 was very unusual in many ways). Feels like certain people want to push xVx into something just because they don't want to do it themselfs...
|
You're really ignorant Mr. Golan. By being in DLR last round, It didn't make it any easier then being in another alliances. Infact it probably made it harder in many respects. I'm absolutely sick of people trying to take credits away from DLR round 30. Let me tell you some facts Golan. DLR had incommings. When DLR had incommings, we ALL grounded defence and we 100% deffed it making it unefficent for alliances to keep targgeting us. BUT ALSO, when we had incommings from alliances, the next day, after we deffed all we could, we 24/7 raided big planets in those alliances, demoralising and roid raping there best/biggest planets, completely slowing ANY alliance down, Ask GM about this, ask ND hcs, ask Wish... Ascendancy did not hit us because of this. whatever crap you keep coming up with about how BGs only worked in R30. Watch DLR do well this round, because DLR is full of active/decent players who care about there friends etc, much like Ascendancy core. I wish people would realise this and stop saying DLR had a easy round blah blah blah. DLR MADE DLR HAVE AN EASY ROUND. not the other way round as far as I'm concerned.