Re: xVx naps Ascendancy
I don't get this debate.
Without the bgs - asc beat xvx easily. Without xvx, ascendancy would have been #1.
Sure you may say that xvx played a bigger role than the bgs - but isn't that to be 100% expected since they're actually the ones fighting for #1? But the bgs sure as hell can take some pride (and credit) for what they've done this round...
Or am I missing something?
All muchado about nothing.
|