Quote:
Originally Posted by lokken
They would not be unreasonable; they would simply be consciously acting against a substantially real risk that they would be heavy favourites to lose the round.
|
See, it's the "consciously" bit I'm not so sure of. Anyway maybe unreasonable is the wrong word. Incoherently, illogically, counter-productively.. take your pick.
Quote:
Originally Posted by zebra
How is Denial not winning the war against Vgn/ND if they have a higher average roids and score?
|
Recent value growth is much more interesting.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Recluse
Which random alliance is idling to win?
|
Well both CT and ND have so far proven to be unwilling to perform war-like actions, so the answer is really quite simple.