View Single Post
Unread 20 May 2003, 14:30   #64
Dante Hicks
Clerk
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Posts: 13,940
Dante Hicks has ascended to a higher existance and no longer needs rep points to prove the size of his e-penis.Dante Hicks has ascended to a higher existance and no longer needs rep points to prove the size of his e-penis.Dante Hicks has ascended to a higher existance and no longer needs rep points to prove the size of his e-penis.Dante Hicks has ascended to a higher existance and no longer needs rep points to prove the size of his e-penis.Dante Hicks has ascended to a higher existance and no longer needs rep points to prove the size of his e-penis.Dante Hicks has ascended to a higher existance and no longer needs rep points to prove the size of his e-penis.Dante Hicks has ascended to a higher existance and no longer needs rep points to prove the size of his e-penis.Dante Hicks has ascended to a higher existance and no longer needs rep points to prove the size of his e-penis.Dante Hicks has ascended to a higher existance and no longer needs rep points to prove the size of his e-penis.Dante Hicks has ascended to a higher existance and no longer needs rep points to prove the size of his e-penis.Dante Hicks has ascended to a higher existance and no longer needs rep points to prove the size of his e-penis.
Quote:
Originally posted by CrashTester
The idea is exactly the same. What you percieve to be worthless is not worthless to everyone, so it doesnt make it right if that person wants to destroy it.
So what is your criteria for right and wrong then? Let's say you like eating carrots. There might be an individual (or society) in the world which condemns this behaviour as immoral or wrong. Does that make your behaviour wrong?

Clearly individuals can only act and make judgements based on their own sets of values. Animals and people are objectively different. This may not matter to you of course, and you are under no obligation to follow mine or Snurx's reasoning.
Dante Hicks is offline   Reply With Quote