View Single Post
Unread 30 Apr 2009, 11:35   #49
Kargool
Up The Hatters!
 
Kargool's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Kenilworth Road
Posts: 3,012
Kargool is a pillar of this Internet societyKargool is a pillar of this Internet societyKargool is a pillar of this Internet societyKargool is a pillar of this Internet societyKargool is a pillar of this Internet societyKargool is a pillar of this Internet societyKargool is a pillar of this Internet societyKargool is a pillar of this Internet societyKargool is a pillar of this Internet societyKargool is a pillar of this Internet societyKargool is a pillar of this Internet society
Re: Drastically lower alliance tag limit

Quote:
Originally Posted by Light View Post
If Asc is going to dominate this round and there be no competition? thus your argument for reducing the alliance limit..

Then surely there is a challange to be in xVx, CT, ND or even Rock to withstand the Asc pressure. Also, if enough people hadnt deemed the big tags to be ineffective this round (ineffective at fighting Asc) then we would still have a decent war.

I dont see how going into a smaller tag has made the round more challenging for you, unless your smaller tag intends to take Asc on? instead of avoid war?

The answer to that is simply: there is no current combination that can work to bring down Asc. For that the lack of organization between the other alliances playing are to weak. When xVx recruit players telling them that they should join xVx cause they are not going to attack Ascendancy, and with that manage to fill their tag, it should be a proof of the ultimate defeat of the other alliances.


I think that many that are in the "smaller" tags at the moment is trying to prove just that, and are also trying to establish a more competitive environment for themselves looking at Ascendancy as a nr 1, but fighting between themselves for their own amusement. Currently Ascendancy is a bit like barbarians in god mode in Civilization.
__________________
Planetarion veteran
Kargool is offline   Reply With Quote