Re: Ascendancy v Apprime
Quote:
Originally Posted by [JungleMuffin]
Look londo, i dont know u as well as Asc, but i know u well enough to cut the shit. With Xan fleets, versus ETD emp fleets, there will be no hard slog. There will be absolute ****ing slaughter.
In this thread, and others, talk of Asc vs App, has gone from lets block App, cos they are evil, to lets let it be 1v1 solo......
Ladies and Gentlemen, Asc will never ever ask for a 1vs1 battle, unless they know they will win clearly. Youve seen this from previous politics, youve seen this first hand. Asc are calling for all alliances to sit out, because they know if people do, they will win.
People, in all honesty: Emp planets cannot, and will not, ever be able to roid Xan fortress galaxies, on even a slightly competitive scale.
Apprime have done well up till now because most of them went Emp. We all know emp dominate the early round play, then fall away substantially, when facing balanced fleets. Im telling you this now: App played their trump card early. Now they are at the mercy of Asc.
|
fact #1: Apprime has more xan planets than any other race.
fact #2: Most of those xans are also in "fortress gals" with the added bonus that the big apprime gals actually have fence aswell, the asc ones does not.
fact #3: You went emp, slap yourself for not thinking long term.
fact #4: Don't talk about r28 if you don't know what happend.
fact #5: Xan gals attacked properly are not harder to roid than any other gal.
__________________
Golan - Ascendancy
Planets.
Zik: 3rd(r30), 4th(r52), 7th(r27), 9th(r26), 31st(r51)
Ter: 3rd(r50), 4th(r53), 4th(r37), 5th(r31) 7th (r58)
Xan: 3rd(r36), 40th(r57) 54th(r33), 104th(r29)
Cat: 8th (r54), 9th(r48), 12th (r55), 20th(r32), 77th(r23), 103rd(r38), 150th(r34), 152nd(r24),
Etd: 14th(r28)
Those damn emp races..
|