[JonnyBGood]

Originally Posted by DrunkenViking

You need to sepperate what you think from whats a fact.

Dmnts barely wanted to ask for def on certain incs, and he deffed other members more than most(one of the top defenders). I gave my fleet to his escortservice, but he didnt even take it 90% of the time. The one time i did escort him, he told me to land with him rather than recall. He dc'd and set up attacks during the entire round and was one of VsN's 4 most active officers in that respect. If you seriously think that .intel 12:3 tells you all you need to know about a player you are far out. Dmnts in no way played more for his own planet or galaxy than any other member of vsn, with the exception of a few in random gals that we quite frankly didnt prioritize at all. I can, hands down, honestly say that i've played with 70 more egoistic people over the rounds i spent in asc.

It doesn't matter what he did that was good. He broke his own alliances rules to save a galaxy mate. He prioritised his galaxy ahead of his alliance. This is a fact.

I'd like to reclaim that you're stupid if you're gonna use the phrase that "we hit dmnts because he's a selfish fencer" as an excuse or a justification for hitting him, and thinking that anyone with a common sense will believe you. Why can't you just say it like it is? "We hit dmnts because we wanted to secure our top planet the win". That excuse/reason is much more accurate. You don't ****ing need to make up an agenda for every little thing you do jbg. If you still feel you do need to make up an agenda, then ****ing make sure you got your facts straight.

You see this would make sense if I hadn't been in exactly the same situation before. In round 31 I didn't like the fact santa was winning at all. Elviz had escorted him, he'd gotten DLR to hit achi (pretty sure the reverse was true as well in fairness). Did we break the NAP with 2 days to go to get achi a win? No. In fact I actually got a bunch of people to launch on him with fake attack missions on the last tick just to troll everyone. Because while I was unhappy that santa was winning ahead of a good friend of mine I didn't think he'd done anything that justified us actually ****ing him over for #1. In dmnts case however I felt it was well deserved.

I do get that it sucks for you that you didnt get to do what you wanted this round(kill all the fences?), but taking a dump on dmnts just to "correct" your own failure doesnt sit well with me.

Do you seriously think I'm genuinely unhappy that we didn't manage to actually kill like 50 ****ing galaxies? I'd have to spend every single waking minute of my life playing PA with 99 other like-minded individuals to accomplish that. Tell you what, my goal for next round will be rank 1-100 ascendancy planets. If we don't achieve that you can blame my taking whatever political actions I do on that!