Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Mzyxptlk
Who says alliance D's reason wasn't "alliance B attacked us"?
On a sidenote, I'm not arguing alliance B "shouldn't" have attacked alliance D or that there should be rules stating which alliance can target which. If the #1 alliance feels like hitting the #10 alliance, by all means, let them do it. It'd be sad and stupid, but they're free to do as they wish.
|
It is imply'ed. My point was alliance D acted on alliance X's orders and u argued that alliance D could have done it for their own reasons. Which is kinda like admitting guilt. Also that Alliance D's attacks on alliance B's increased by 400% can't simply be explained by the fact that alliance B was fat. Cause logic dictates otherwise. 400% increase is a bit to much of a coincidence.