View Single Post
Unread 4 Mar 2010, 14:48   #69
Banned
Banned
 
Banned's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: ******
Posts: 2,326
Banned contributes so much and asks for so littleBanned contributes so much and asks for so littleBanned contributes so much and asks for so littleBanned contributes so much and asks for so littleBanned contributes so much and asks for so littleBanned contributes so much and asks for so littleBanned contributes so much and asks for so littleBanned contributes so much and asks for so littleBanned contributes so much and asks for so littleBanned contributes so much and asks for so littleBanned contributes so much and asks for so little
Re: Round 36 predictions

Quote:
Originally Posted by Psi_K View Post
The round will end 2 weeks into the round with one of the two 100 man alliances dominating the round, everyone will go on a 5 week idle fest and I'll keep laughing at the idiots that decided that 100 man alliances (EVEN if they only allowed 25 players to be counted towards the score) was a good idea.
Idiots.
In my opinion the counted score limit is a bad, bad idea. It rewards alliances that focus their score on the top 65 members, while punishing alliances that have less "superstar" planets.

I know we've manipulated this in the past, for example by sacrificing non-counting planets for the benefit of counting planets, or escorting marginal, but active planets for XP towards the end of the round.

I guess it opens up some opportunities, but on the whole I find it damaging and don't understand the logic behind it at all.
Banned is offline   Reply With Quote