User Name
Password
Remember Me?
Planetarion Forums
>
Search Forums
Search Results
Register
FAQ
Members List
Calendar
Arcade
Today's Posts
Search
Search Forums
Advanced Search
Go to Page...
Showing results 1 to 36 of 36
Search took
0.00
seconds.
Search:
Posts Made By:
loophole
Forum:
Strategic Discussions
10 Oct 2015, 13:35
Replies:
275
Santa Stats
Views:
52,755
Posted By
loophole
Re: Santa Stats
Well, I started to feel an ounce of respect for Tia from that post until the end when she dissed you just for funsies.
Forum:
Strategic Discussions
10 Oct 2015, 13:29
Replies:
275
Santa Stats
Views:
52,755
Posted By
loophole
Re: Santa Stats
Or top 1000 would be a good indication of race spread
Forum:
Strategic Discussions
10 Oct 2015, 13:28
Replies:
275
Santa Stats
Views:
52,755
Posted By
loophole
Re: Santa Stats
Got a link to original set before "tweaks"
Forum:
Strategic Discussions
10 Oct 2015, 13:25
Replies:
275
Santa Stats
Views:
52,755
Posted By
loophole
Re: Santa Stats
This set had the greatest race equality? What changes did they make? Xan got inits lowered and damage increased? Then etd had a similar effect?
I don't give a shit what new thing is being added....
Forum:
Strategic Discussions
10 Oct 2015, 05:16
Replies:
275
Santa Stats
Views:
52,755
Posted By
loophole
Re: Santa Stats
W
T
F
Why?
I'm seriously disappointed. Appocco? What's wrong with Santa's set? Xan weren't good enough? I don't get it.
Forum:
Strategic Discussions
5 Oct 2015, 04:15
Replies:
275
Santa Stats
Views:
52,755
Posted By
loophole
Re: Santa Stats
I've not looked in great detail, but I'm starting now. As most have said......interesting set. I'll go one further and say this is by far the most balanced set I've seen in years. It's going to be...
Forum:
Strategic Discussions
25 May 2015, 03:55
Replies:
228
Blue's Stat Set Rnd 62
Views:
56,538
Posted By
loophole
Re: Blue's Stat Set Rnd 62
So still not final? BB are you going cath now? True test of whether Stas are balanced is if you can play cath :) so I must know.....what will you play?
Forum:
Strategic Discussions
23 May 2015, 05:28
Replies:
228
Blue's Stat Set Rnd 62
Views:
56,538
Posted By
loophole
Re: Blue's Stat Set Rnd 62
Any changes planned or are these stats final now?
Forum:
Strategic Discussions
21 May 2015, 21:21
Replies:
228
Blue's Stat Set Rnd 62
Views:
56,538
Posted By
loophole
Re: Blue's Stat Set Rnd 62
Two maybe, I think. We chose the harder path for sure.
Forum:
Strategic Discussions
21 May 2015, 20:04
Replies:
228
Blue's Stat Set Rnd 62
Views:
56,538
Posted By
loophole
Re: Blue's Stat Set Rnd 62
yes, and xan/ter/zik were under represented compared to racial ratio of the universe. ETD had fighters AND De.
Being on the receiving end of De incoming I can say 5 etd coming wouldn't worry me...
Forum:
Strategic Discussions
21 May 2015, 19:35
Replies:
228
Blue's Stat Set Rnd 62
Views:
56,538
Posted By
loophole
Re: Blue's Stat Set Rnd 62
And what were the top 100 distributions for ter, xan, zik, and etd?
Forum:
Strategic Discussions
21 May 2015, 19:29
Replies:
228
Blue's Stat Set Rnd 62
Views:
56,538
Posted By
loophole
Re: Blue's Stat Set Rnd 62
you have to account for the 5% scanners/covoppers that went cath also. Not to mention the bots, supports, and ship farms.
Adjust for that and cath have a disproportionate representation in the top...
Forum:
Strategic Discussions
21 May 2015, 19:24
Replies:
228
Blue's Stat Set Rnd 62
Views:
56,538
Posted By
loophole
Re: Blue's Stat Set Rnd 62
I mean, it sounds to me like you would like for a Cath to be able to solo any race double their their own value and need monster team ups to get through a cath defense.
I think what you are...
Forum:
Strategic Discussions
21 May 2015, 19:05
Replies:
228
Blue's Stat Set Rnd 62
Views:
56,538
Posted By
loophole
Re: Blue's Stat Set Rnd 62
I can agree there is no NEED to nerf scarab if you buff emp resistance accross 5 ships, but why? When you can just change the one ship. buffing those em resistances would have made cath more...
Forum:
Strategic Discussions
21 May 2015, 18:59
Replies:
228
Blue's Stat Set Rnd 62
Views:
56,538
Posted By
loophole
Re: Blue's Stat Set Rnd 62
because beetle can defend against broker and hits first. So it needs to be slightly lower eff for balance.
There's no reason to doggedly make cath emp higher eff. Or terran armor always higher....
Forum:
Strategic Discussions
21 May 2015, 18:55
Replies:
228
Blue's Stat Set Rnd 62
Views:
56,538
Posted By
loophole
Re: Blue's Stat Set Rnd 62
I can agree, last round had some great stats, but scarab were the worst part of it. IMO a slightly nerfed scarab would have made the set better.
Forum:
Strategic Discussions
21 May 2015, 18:46
Replies:
228
Blue's Stat Set Rnd 62
Views:
56,538
Posted By
loophole
Re: Blue's Stat Set Rnd 62
Beetle does out init broker. with a fairly good eff(for these stats). So did you have a deeper concern? I mean besides one ETD ship having higher eff than cath, while being prefired BY a cath ship? ...
Forum:
Strategic Discussions
21 May 2015, 18:02
Replies:
228
Blue's Stat Set Rnd 62
Views:
56,538
Posted By
loophole
Re: Blue's Stat Set Rnd 62
Regardless, I think government has so little to do with stats, that everything posted today has been a waste of time on the topic at hand:STATS.
I'd like to apologize for my part in this.
Now...
Forum:
Strategic Discussions
21 May 2015, 17:45
Replies:
228
Blue's Stat Set Rnd 62
Views:
56,538
Posted By
loophole
Re: Blue's Stat Set Rnd 62
And there it is. Londo is wrong. No concession given on a point well made. Just wrong.
Butcher says it's more costly for high ranks to anarchy than low ranks. Discussion over!
Yes, it costs...
Forum:
Strategic Discussions
21 May 2015, 17:24
Replies:
228
Blue's Stat Set Rnd 62
Views:
56,538
Posted By
loophole
Re: Blue's Stat Set Rnd 62
BB is more concerned with being right than being correct. So I'm afraid while you are correct Londo, you will inevitably be wrong; As far as BB is concerned.
But good try. I commend you on using...
Forum:
Strategic Discussions
21 May 2015, 17:15
Replies:
228
Blue's Stat Set Rnd 62
Views:
56,538
Posted By
loophole
Re: Blue's Stat Set Rnd 62
My comments were on anarchy. When did I say anything about cath emp eff?
Those % in my post were about potency, not cath eff.
Forum:
Strategic Discussions
21 May 2015, 16:15
Replies:
228
Blue's Stat Set Rnd 62
Views:
56,538
Posted By
loophole
Re: Blue's Stat Set Rnd 62
less potent maybe. But a drop of water in a bottle of liquor makes it less potent. Technicalities.
Cath also has the option to go demo for the first 200 ticks and switch to corp or tot whatever....
Forum:
Strategic Discussions
21 May 2015, 13:37
Replies:
228
Blue's Stat Set Rnd 62
Views:
56,538
Posted By
loophole
Re: Blue's Stat Set Rnd 62
[QUOTE=BloodyButcher;3242961]You seriously dont play a lot of cath then.
I dont think you even know how they are working, and what changes the new goverment did to the strengths of the race.
If i...
Forum:
Strategic Discussions
18 May 2015, 05:58
Replies:
131
booji stats proposals
Views:
24,362
Posted By
loophole
Re: booji stats proposals
De was also my biggest worry on these stats. Cath de targets too much imo. I see why you want it like that, but without 2 tick defence it's too much. There are no fighters targeting de. There are no...
Forum:
Strategic Discussions
16 May 2015, 12:17
Replies:
131
booji stats proposals
Views:
24,362
Posted By
loophole
Re: booji stats proposals
Almost and maybe this or maybe that? You distinctly said there were 3 sets earlier being proposed in addition to the 2 we've seen already. Do you ever consider what you type?
I just what to see...
Forum:
Strategic Discussions
16 May 2015, 04:21
Replies:
131
booji stats proposals
Views:
24,362
Posted By
loophole
Re: booji stats proposals
Sad. I, myself liked a lot about this set. Sure there were some things I thought would cause problems, but you'll never please everyone and there will never be a perfect Stat set. Period. The main...
Forum:
Planetarion Discussions
8 May 2015, 14:42
Replies:
266
Round 61 Welcome to the Forum Thread!
Views:
29,017
Posted By
loophole
Re: Round 61 Welcome to the Forum Thread!
loophole
Forum:
Planetarion Discussions
25 Feb 2015, 05:20
Replies:
2
galaxy banners
Views:
3,190
Posted By
loophole
galaxy banners
I'm curious why galaxy banners aren't like they used to be. I've been away a few years, and now I don't see top galaxies making banners with member names.
I don't see alliance logos on banners....
Forum:
Alliance Recruitment
11 Feb 2015, 22:07
Replies:
23
Pacifism
Views:
5,697
Posted By
loophole
Re: Pacifism
does booji leak? I think so :D
Forum:
Planetarion Discussions
16 Jan 2015, 15:18
Replies:
260
The Round 60 Welcome to the Forum Thread
Views:
31,034
Posted By
loophole
Re: The Round 60 Welcome to the Forum Thread
loophole
Forum:
Planetarion Discussions
6 Nov 2014, 20:10
Replies:
2
research transferral
Views:
4,147
Posted By
loophole
Re: research transferral
Thanks, appocomaster pm me already.
guess you have to have it researched to see what the actual operation is called.
Forum:
Planetarion Discussions
6 Nov 2014, 15:57
Replies:
2
research transferral
Views:
4,147
Posted By
loophole
research transferral
what's the formula for research transferral cov op?
i can't find it in the manual under covops or formulae
thanks
Forum:
Planetarion Discussions
6 Nov 2014, 15:55
Replies:
337
The Round 59 Welcome to the Forums Thread!
Views:
53,065
Posted By
loophole
Re: The Round 59 Welcome to the Forums Thread!
loophole
Forum:
Planetarion Discussions
28 Aug 2014, 17:55
Replies:
303
The Round 58 Welcome to the Forum Thread!
Views:
46,311
Posted By
loophole
Re: The Round 58 Welcome to the Forum Thread!
loophole
Forum:
Planetarion Discussions
28 Aug 2014, 16:54
Replies:
1
Old member having a look around
Views:
4,089
Posted By
loophole
Old member having a look around
Hi guys. I'm glad to see PA is still here. I was just curious about something I read on my stroll through PA memory lane.
In round 57 someone got 3rd by using "MCs" and escorts.
What are MCs? ...
Forum:
Alliance Recruitment
5 Aug 2011, 00:50
Replies:
48
Apprime looking for new idiots
Views:
17,071
Posted By
loophole
Re: Apprime looking for new idiots
You just looking for new idiots? Or would shitty old ones do the job as well?
Showing results 1 to 36 of 36
Forum Jump
User Control Panel
Private Messages
Subscriptions
Who's Online
Search Forums
Forums Home
Planetarion Administration
Announcements
Forums Issues
Planetarion Help Desk
Planetarion Related Forums
Planetarion Discussions
Departing PA Messages
Planetarion Race History
Planetarion Suggestions
Planetarion Change Tracker
Alliance Discussions
Alliance Recruitment
Strategic Discussions
Non Planetarion Discussions
General Discussions
Clownshoe Corner
Programming and Discussion
Hardware and Tech Support
Roleplaying
All times are GMT +1. The time now is
08:02
.
-- Planetarion 2.0
---- Planetarion 2.0 - Nuclear Ashes
------ Planetarion 2.0 - Mobile Infantry
-- Round 10 Default
-- Round 8-9 Default
-- Round 5-7 Default
-- Greenpepper
-- LairyFish
-- Dreammaker
-- Xmas Style
-- Retro v1
-- Retro v2
-- Pro-Vizion
-- AlienSkin
-- Pro-Vizion(Small)
-- Pro Vizion Thin
Planetarion
-
Top
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2002 - 2018