2006 Posting Activity Spectacular!
Whose posted most this year? Or in the last six months? Who have clearly abandoned us and who is the new life of the forums is contained, in all it's objective glory, below.
Rather than try to fit everything in one table here, I've posted a couple. The overall summary / info is here : http://www.harriscrew.com/~dante/Poster_Activity.htm (apologies if that doesn't work in your browser - it seems OK in IE and Opera but it's an Excel produced file so wouldn't be surprised if it doesn't work elsewhere). As always gaps exist where people are in the top x now but weren't in it before. It also means some of the lower ranks are wrong but I doubt anyone cares. Posts in Last 12 Months Code:
Rank Nick Posts in 2006 Posts in Last 6 Months Code:
Rank Nick Posts since June 2006 Code:
Nick Last Post Approx Days Since Code:
Rank Nick Dec-05 Jun-06 Now |
Re: 2006 Posting Activity Spectacular!
The last bit is kind of :(
|
Re: 2006 Posting Activity Spectacular!
thanks for completely ignoring me :up:
|
Re: 2006 Posting Activity Spectacular!
Quote:
|
Re: 2006 Posting Activity Spectacular!
I didn't realise I'd actually posted that much in the past year. Oh well, stats always make me a happy :bunny:
|
Re: 2006 Posting Activity Spectacular!
Oh I see what this is. Oh yes, it's all so clear now you and your little groups. So exclusive, so loved up.
Where's my love Dante! Screw you all, I'm going to start my own forum with blackjack and hookers. In fact, forget the blackjack! |
Re: 2006 Posting Activity Spectacular!
I`m not on any list!?*
*I now hear some old tune with the words ringing in my head "Your names not down, your`re not coming in; sorry not tonight; not to night; I`ve told you once........" |
Re: 2006 Posting Activity Spectacular!
Quote:
edit: 420! |
Re: 2006 Posting Activity Spectacular!
You won't be on any list if you haven't currently got over 2,075 (ish) posts or if you didn't have 1,887 (ish) or more in June 06.
|
Re: 2006 Posting Activity Spectacular!
i am pretty suprised at how little i posted. Pure quality, every one of them though.
I didnt realise it was just 6 months ago mm ****ed off though, thought it was much longer than that |
Re: 2006 Posting Activity Spectacular!
Quote:
I've posted a lot less in the last 6 months than in the first half of this year - 1707 posts vs 765. That's mainly because I haven't got involved in many debates, and I've deleted quite a lot of posts while being halfway through writing them. Since I never really make threads, I'll have to sort this out for 2007. |
Re: 2006 Posting Activity Spectacular!
See I dont really post here much for a main reason, I like visiting this thing called "Outdoors" where I interact with this group called "Real People". Its nice not getting a warm and fuzzy feeling of being part of an internet elite ;)
I'd like to know how someone posts in negative numbers ;p |
Re: 2006 Posting Activity Spectacular!
Quote:
|
Re: 2006 Posting Activity Spectacular!
Quote:
|
Re: 2006 Posting Activity Spectacular!
It really puzzles me how I managed to end up on the ranks. I suppose I've been posting on deleted threads, eh, then. Maybe I need to start catching up on 2007.
|
Re: 2006 Posting Activity Spectacular!
Hang on, where the hell am I?
|
Re: 2006 Posting Activity Spectacular!
Quote:
|
Re: 2006 Posting Activity Spectacular!
Quote:
|
Re: 2006 Posting Activity Spectacular!
Quote:
Secondly to make a comparison I'd also have to have information about the top 300 posters six months ago and a year ago (which I don't). So while I could put a table together of the top 300 posters, I wouldn't be able to work out how many of their posts were in the last six months, so most of it would be blank. If I was working from periodic backups of the users table then it'd be different but all I'm doing is comparing the information here with the information in a thread I made six months ago here and neatening it up in a text editor. In short, it's a question of pragmatism / laziness rather than some form of elitism. If you want to save the top 300 into an easily formatted table then go right ahead. * = It's slightly more complicated than this. JammyJim as forum admin doesn't appear on the members list page and a couple of people are new entries so overall there's about 94 or something people in the list. |
Re: 2006 Posting Activity Spectacular!
Quote:
it's just that people with fewer posts aren't worth mentioning ... |
Re: 2006 Posting Activity Spectacular!
*sigh* so basically cos i havent replied my way to 2000+ from the early years (i've had this account for over 6 years now) i dont get included ..
should i feel cheated ? |
Re: 2006 Posting Activity Spectacular!
Quote:
|
Re: 2006 Posting Activity Spectacular!
I think the drop in postings is attributable to the recent lack of flame wars.
|
Re: 2006 Posting Activity Spectacular!
Quote:
|
Re: 2006 Posting Activity Spectacular!
Quote:
|
Re: 2006 Posting Activity Spectacular!
less than 1k posts this year? bloody hell :(
|
Re: 2006 Posting Activity Spectacular!
Quote:
edit: you've got Banned listed there as having not posted for a long time, I think its because Jesterina decided to start posting on his other account instead (I honestly don't know why :( ) |
Re: 2006 Posting Activity Spectacular!
he moved to that shadowed land known as stockton, where anything more high tech than the wheel still arouses suspicion
|
Re: 2006 Posting Activity Spectacular!
Quote:
edit : See this thread for details : http://pirate.planetarion.com/showthread.php?t=191582 Quote:
So pig's post count above doesn't include the posts he made as 'Gimmick' and Nusselt is listed above as not having posted but he's actually been fairly active with his 'milo' account. Since the admins can change a nick upon request (or have in the past) if people wanted to save their post counts they could, so I presume they don't care. p.s. Anyone who is curious to how many posts they make in the next six months, just post your post-count in this thread. dda posted how many posts he had made in the old thread and so even though he wasn't in the old top 90 I could still work out how many posts he had made. |
Re: 2006 Posting Activity Spectacular!
now i didnt realise that he had totally gone tbh :( oh well
i know i may not be the most active bod anymore, but i dont understand why people leave totally, having been here this long i cant imagine life without checking the forums occationally :) |
Re: 2006 Posting Activity Spectacular!
713
|
Re: 2006 Posting Activity Spectacular!
MM is posting on PB as Ritual Noise if anyone wants him.
Out of the other 'top' posters that haven't posted in the last 6 months only Newsbot, Aryn, Kura and Vaio are posting exclusively over there now. EDIT oh and IncubusGod |
Re: 2006 Posting Activity Spectacular!
34th G.K Zhukov 445
I'm not posting enough to be top30 :( |
Re: 2006 Posting Activity Spectacular!
#1 poster in the last 6 months!
Yes! STRONG! I knew I'd win something this year :) :) :) |
Re: 2006 Posting Activity Spectacular!
10th/20th
I dont know whether to be proud or hang my head in shame :( |
Re: 2006 Posting Activity Spectacular!
Quote:
|
Re: 2006 Posting Activity Spectacular!
I have posted loads in 2006 yet it says 0 - why is that, statman?
|
Re: 2006 Posting Activity Spectacular!
Quote:
|
Re: 2006 Posting Activity Spectacular!
Quote:
|
Re: 2006 Posting Activity Spectacular!
I think this is a great thing and Dante is wonderful for putting the effort in to do it.
Deep down we're all number geeks and love stats (why else would we have even contemplated signing up for Planetarion, however long ago it may be?!). Noone else has said it so I thought I should :up: |
Re: 2006 Posting Activity Spectacular!
Quote:
|
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:05. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2002 - 2018