Cannabis Cameron
So it turns out, shock horror that the leader of the official opposition has smoked cannabis. Where did this monstrous act take place? In Eton, of all places!
Who would have thought it possible that: 1) A public schoolboy would take illegal substances and 2) Become a politician the mind really does boggle. http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/6350909.stm thankfully Norman tebbit was on hand to offer his support Quote:
|
Re: Cannabis Cameron
I forget, are you a Marxist or a Trotskyist?
|
Re: Cannabis Cameron
honesty in a politician ......
argghhhhhhhhhhh!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! THE WORLD IS ENDING! |
Re: Cannabis Cameron
Golly Gosh! Didn't see that one coming. Politicians, Eaton & Drugs?
Never! |
Re: Cannabis Cameron
But did he inhale? ;)
|
Re: Cannabis Cameron
Quote:
|
Re: Cannabis Cameron
Quote:
|
Re: Cannabis Cameron
its just that there are more state schools, so overall the numbers are higher than in the few public schools left.
|
Re: Cannabis Cameron
Quote:
I, like Spiderman (he's my favourite cause he's the most emo :cool: ) fight for what I believe in, in the way I see fit (usually moaning on GD). the doctrinal limits of a party are often devisive in that they demand submission to a leader. Should the leadership become corrupted (as it inevitably will should it become large enough to make a significant impact on national politics) then reverting back from that point becomes very difficult. take the Labour Party for example, when Blair goes it will still be controlled by New Labour so it's not as easy as removing the top individual if his rabble still remains, constantly lurking in the background waiting to seize power again. Look at the tories with their fancy new logo and internet adverts, the backbench is still full of rotting old zombie throwbacks. |
Re: Cannabis Cameron
Quote:
|
Re: Cannabis Cameron
You wouldn't get druggie ruffians like Cameron in UKIP that's a cert.
|
Re: Cannabis Cameron
The Norwegian Prime Minister smoked cannabis during his youth and his sister is a drug addict.
|
Re: Cannabis Cameron
Quote:
Time is not a relative thing. You (and the daily mail; oh what ghastly company you keep) seem to care about what a boy once did. A child. And your justification is that many years later that boy went on to stand for public office? pathetic. Quote:
Though it falls on deaf ears. |
Re: Cannabis Cameron
Quote:
There, maybe 30% of the pupils in my year had tried Cannabis, about 10% take it regularly. I'd say less than 10% had ever tried Class As and I'm guessing that there were only 1 or 2 people who take them. I now go to a sixth form at a public school full of rich Jewish kids. Around 80%, if not more, of the pupils have taken Cannabis. Of those, 50-60% do it regularly Around 40% have tried class As and over 20% take them regularly or semi-regularly. Don't even get me started on Class A drugs, especially since "Blacks" are scared shitless of them and will rarely go near them, whereas people from public schools read up on the drugs before deciding that they'd like to try it etc. |
Re: Cannabis Cameron
Quote:
Maybe you and _Kila_ could form a comedic double act and warm up the crowd for Deffeh and horns band. |
Re: Cannabis Cameron
Quote:
could that be more to do with the cost of the drug and being able to choose because you can afford it ? |
Re: Cannabis Cameron
It's nothing to do with the cost. Drugs are cheap. Certainly cheap enough that if you want them you can get them.
|
Re: Cannabis Cameron
It is partially the cost, but the poorly educated idiots are scared of drugs because of all the propaganda that has been pumped into us from a young age about saying no to drugs and drugs being bad; more intelligent people tend to think for themselves and make their own judgements about them whereas some people don't want to think for themselves.
|
Re: Cannabis Cameron
Quote:
|
Re: Cannabis Cameron
Quote:
What is this all elusive 'point'? |
Re: Cannabis Cameron
Quote:
|
Re: Cannabis Cameron
Quote:
|
Re: Cannabis Cameron
I'm agreeing with Yahwe, which point did we miss?
I found a part of your post which I disagreed with and addressed it, that doesn't mean that I missed the point of your post. |
Re: Cannabis Cameron
The point of the thread seems to be to inform people that something that people shouldn't care about has happened.
|
Re: Cannabis Cameron
Quote:
|
Re: Cannabis Cameron
Quote:
|
Re: Cannabis Cameron
Quote:
I don't care about it in the slightest - it just shows how desperate our media is for a story. In fact, Cameron could probably turn it to his favour (appeal to young voters lol) by admitting it in the right way, but sacrificing principles (politician's right to a private life) probably isn't the right way to go. |
Re: Cannabis Cameron
that I have to make this post degrades all of us.
Firstly, I would like to point out that the language and tone of the piece (i.e. the initial post) was of a rather sarcastic nature. I was hoping to illuminate this point with the two specifics I indicated in the form of bullet-points. Now, I understand it can sometimes be difficult to convey such an expression over the internet through text alone. I was also expecting (somewhat arrogantly, I must admit) that my feelings regarding the media on which I have made numerous threads and posts, lambasting every pathetic bias riddled column inch might be known to some of the more regular users. Clearly, I was wrong about this yet I thought that there might be enough evidence within this thread that would allow you to get an inkling that I am not actually a disenchanted member of the Conservative Party who would want our Glorious Leader hanged for smoking a joint half a life time ago. Firstly, there was this: Quote:
Quote:
It is possible that you may have considered the former quote to be some kind of in-joke between tory chums. If so, you were spectaularly wrong. My reply in turn was a quasi-serious explaination regarding my dislike for centralised power groups, regardless of whom they claim to represent. At no point (except in jest) did I claim to give an opinion on his actions nor a serious comment on what should happen to him as a result. At no point did I claim this thread to be be an attempt at 'crime-fighting', though Spiderman really is my favourite superhero. In conclusion, this thread was merely an attempt to make fun of a non-story by a hypocritical media who prefer gossip over news whilst taking a cheap shot at a man for whom I have quite high levels of contempt. the way drugs are viewed in this country is a disgrace and so is the view that politicians should be born superhuman and never err. I've tried to be thorough in my explaination, but if you find you need a simpler breakdown of what I have written, feel free to ask. |
Re: Cannabis Cameron
Quote:
|
Re: Cannabis Cameron
In this thread, Yahwe, Furball and Kila were really, really stupid.
|
Re: Cannabis Cameron
Quote:
The few Etonians I know wouldn't think twice about taking a few disco biscuits. I'm not disagreeing with you - but public schoolboys are just as bad at LEAST for substance abuse. Just look at Prince Harry! (lolz) |
Re: Cannabis Cameron
Quote:
Only tk could have made this post. |
Re: Cannabis Cameron
Quote:
ASG - my reading of your post was that you, as a fairly left-wing member of the forum, was condemning Cameron for his drug use as a teenager. I suspect that a number of other posters thought the same. Sarcasm is always obvious when it's pointed out... |
Re: Cannabis Cameron
Quote:
|
Re: Cannabis Cameron
Quote:
Quote:
|
Re: Cannabis Cameron
Quote:
|
Re: Cannabis Cameron
Quote:
|
Re: Cannabis Cameron
I'm not sure what I want to do in this thread but I want it to be really offensive and really hurtful.
|
Re: Cannabis Cameron
why dont you make a joke about someones mother lol
|
Re: Cannabis Cameron
Quote:
Edit: Pro-slavery? |
Re: Cannabis Cameron
Quote:
|
Re: Cannabis Cameron
Quote:
|
Re: Cannabis Cameron
Quote:
|
Re: Cannabis Cameron
pff... you guys make too much noise about some big shot smoking up some herb god knows how long ago.......
How about your president (or prime minister or whatnot) being addicted to coke in middle years of his life and then being elected twice to run the office !? And were just fine with that. In fact, that topic never even comes up in any of our conversations... |
Re: Cannabis Cameron
I noticed on the BBC yesterday that the main story seemed to be that this was a non-story.
Even Labour politicians were coming out and saying "we don't care": Quote:
|
Re: Cannabis Cameron
Quote:
|
Re: Cannabis Cameron
Look, in case you were wondering it's all crap. Someone at conservative HQ thought: the electorate think we're so far removed from them that we'll never make a decent government. So let's make David out to be an ordinary guy, the kind of guy who took cannabis at university like the rest of the bloody country. Go go gadget tory marketing machine! There was a BBC Radio 3 debate on this with Oliver Letwin and it make me feel ill :(
|
Re: Cannabis Cameron
Quote:
|
Re: Cannabis Cameron
Quote:
I agree this is obviously a non-story and since Cameron has not been as vocal against drugs than some in the past I don't even view this as particularly hypocritical. Although I do note that the Tories want to reverse the reclassification of cannabis, which would mean a theoretical maximum of five years in a Crown Court. Either way I hope the journalists who peddle this drivel feel suitably ashamed. I doubt they will though. :( |
Re: Cannabis Cameron
Quote:
|
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:35. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2002 - 2018