Alliance fleet statistics
 

Someone requested a breakdown of alliance attack statistics.

This is a rough breakdown. I *think* the numbers are pretty accurate; exceptions below

Note that this is run on end-of-round alliance statistics, so:
if someone left the alliance, it ignores them
if someone joined the alliance near the end of the round, it counts all their incs, not just the ones since they joined the alliance
all in-gal defence from alliance planets is counted as in-gal def not alliance def

Re: Alliance fleet statistics
 

Looks like Ult had best gal tactics pre-round and that is what won it for them

Re: Alliance fleet statistics
 

The number of incs Ultores got makes any comparison with the rest of the top 5 pointless.

The tag that really stands out here is FAnG, which had lots of ally defense fleets (1.12 fleets per inc) and the highest coverage rate of all the alliances (45%). Tags with a similar number of incomings did not do nearly as well: CT covered 34% of their incs with 1.08 def fleets per inc, xVx covered 30% with 0.91 def fleets per inc, and ND covered 33% with 1.02 def fleets per inc.

The lesson for roid whores is this: attack whoever is under attack. Failing that, hit anything other than FAnG.

Re: Alliance fleet statistics
 

I'm highly curious as to how you drew that conclusion.

Re: Alliance fleet statistics
 

If I have time I might try and split the alliance in-gal def from non-alliance in-gal def (i.e. Ult may just have had more people per buddy pack)

Re: Alliance fleet statistics
 

Because with considerably more def fleets available ingal, whether Ult or xVx or any other, that frees more fleets up for longer with them to attack and defend with.

That is a considerable amount to make a huge difference

Re: Alliance fleet statistics
 

This might be a good time to explain Ult's ship strategy, incase it has any bearing on these discussions :p

We had 4 fort gals, initially 5-map BPs that grew to 6,6,8,8 with late signs/exiles. These planets were almost all zik/ter/cath/etd cr/bs, with fi/co ships for def.
The rest of the alliance (so about 2/3) were either fenced or random, and playing a fi/co strategy with fr/de class def ships. We did have a few random cr/bs planets as well.

In terms of ingal def, this meant that for the majority of the round, we could only get it from xvx and ND, and then at the end when the entire block was hitting us, we could only get it from ND. So I suspect the majority of those ingal def fleets WERE from ult planets, mainly in the fort gals.

Just incase anyone cared :banana:

Re: Alliance fleet statistics
 

I'm slightly confused by the incs recalled stat. I'm fairly sure more than 28% of fleets recalled from us, for example. I know the tracking sites aren't 100% correct on things like roids lost but that would mean an average fleet landing on Ultores capped around 8 roids. We definitely didn't have that many huge teamups on us.

Re: Alliance fleet statistics
 

The table tells me that DLR either had a brilliant run on politics, or that the DE setup idd gave them so much leeway that noone wanted to go there iot to hadle the ingal def.

Re: Alliance fleet statistics
 

It's more likely that no one cared to hit them because what's the point?

Re: Alliance fleet statistics
 

Yeah, it doesn't look right - there's no way more than 2/3 of attacks landed on us...

Re: Alliance fleet statistics
 

Dont forget though that you cant really get an accurate level of coverage from these stats due to the fact that a hell of a lot of waves we're covered and the attackers just 'crashed' into our defence.

Re: Alliance fleet statistics
 

Ultores PWNED!!!

Re: Alliance fleet statistics
 

What i find most interesting ... as sub top 5 alliance we only had 700 less incommings than CT, ND and XvX !!!!

points to some serious bottom feeding last round

Re: Alliance fleet statistics
 

Considering that Ultores was pretty much the only alliance getting incs in the second half of the round, it's not surprising that their inc count is that low

Re: Alliance fleet statistics
 

Redoing the original post (round 45) with new (better) code etc... may have made a difference?

Re: Alliance fleet statistics
 

You left out TGV!

Re: Alliance fleet statistics
 

TGV didn't play r45!

Re: Alliance fleet statistics
 

So FAnG only had 160 more incs than last rd? I expected more with all the whining going on.....:rolleyes:

Re: Alliance fleet statistics
 

err, check the other thread for this round... these overviews are both overviews for r45 (just updated with the new code).

Re: Alliance fleet statistics
 

Haha, yes, I've just noticed, apologies!!

Re: Alliance fleet statistics
 

You're all looking for this thread on this round's statistics. the one with "Round 46" in the name ;)