Planetarion Forums

Planetarion Forums (https://pirate.planetarion.com/index.php)
-   Alliance Discussions (https://pirate.planetarion.com/forumdisplay.php?f=38)
-   -   Sad change in planetarion history (https://pirate.planetarion.com/showthread.php?t=198632)

HaNzI 27 Apr 2010 10:30

Sad change in planetarion history
 
Not only does the #1 alliance get to hold an astonishing roidlead all round, they also get to safe in the win without much effort. Sure they claim they had incs, but this is of course a mild exaggeration.

Apprime has been visions supporter for several rounds now, letting them pick their own wars and build their alliance on their premises. We were willing to let them win this round, and assist them if a block formed against them, just like they helped us earlier. Vision has now stabbed us, bringing multiple alliances to help them hit Apprime.

We are not afraid of waring Vision alone, honestly we would love to, and seeing how unfair the tables need to be for vision to grow these balls, we feel confident 40 members less would be more then sufficient to rape you another hole. eazy.

The state now is that vision is NAPed to ND/ASC/Penguins/ODDR and they are currently hammering Apprime planets. We in Apprime see this as a win for us, because yet again the universe blocks up on us, even though we are only a tag of 48 people. Since we feel we have proved to everyone how much you suck, we have to do something about this target practice of yours.

Currently we are voting for/against "We will cover every single inc from Vision, and let Newdawn land on us for free"
At the moment, none has voted against.

Farming someone might say, making priorities we say. So tomorrow i hope every single planet from Newdawn participate in attacking Apprime, landing early might be a good idea for the best caps, but if not Vision will flak you.

Good luck chaps, see you on the battlefield!

Kargool 27 Apr 2010 10:37

Re: Sad change in planetarion history
 
I just love your finally retired comment.
Vision is a worthy winner of the round.

Apprime is not, and never will be.

Korsan 27 Apr 2010 11:30

Re: Sad change in planetarion history
 
I'd like to know how things escalated because I really like you Apprime people and am grateful for your support during the last 3 rounds. It's really sad how things developed and tbh I don't enjoy blocking against 1 single alliance. I'd prefer siding with you guys even if it costs our #1 rank because this round is very boring for me.
Ofc I don't know the details about this progress which might change my opinion about this. But I trust VSN HC to have valid reasons for their decision and ofc as a member I'll fully support it even if I'd still prefer a nap between app and vsn.

Knight Theamion 27 Apr 2010 11:32

Re: Sad change in planetarion history
 
Ohnoes stupid ruiners ruin everything!

Also:
http://sandmans.co.uk/?p=viewplanet&x=3&y=1&z=7

I believe this was Apprime's doing.

HaNzI 27 Apr 2010 11:50

Re: Sad change in planetarion history
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Knight Theamion (Post 3191127)
Ohnoes stupid ruiners ruin everything!

Also:
http://sandmans.co.uk/?p=viewplanet&x=3&y=1&z=7

I believe this was Apprime's doing.

It was a normal TP set very late in the morning, obviously that guy wasnt bothered to cover himself!

HaNzI 27 Apr 2010 12:11

Re: Sad change in planetarion history
 
The votes are final and Jihad on Vision is declared with immediate effect.

Mzyxptlk 27 Apr 2010 12:14

Re: Sad change in planetarion history
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by HaNzI (Post 3191122)
Currently we are voting for/against "We will cover every single inc from Vision, and let Newdawn land on us for free"

"We will be farms"? Isn't that against the rules?

HaNzI 27 Apr 2010 12:17

Re: Sad change in planetarion history
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mzyxptlk (Post 3191132)
"We will be farms"? Isn't that against the rules?

We don't have fleets available to defend against Newdawn, so we are just being polite and make them aware of it.

Linkie 27 Apr 2010 12:18

Re: Sad change in planetarion history
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mzyxptlk (Post 3191132)
"We will be farms"? Isn't that against the rules?

I'd say being selective with what incs to cover inside the alliance doesn't count as farming, aslong as you don't purposely decide to not cover incs when you have ships to do it. However, when they let NewDawn know that they can attack them for free, it becomes farming.

HaNzI 27 Apr 2010 12:19

Re: Sad change in planetarion history
 
Prove it

Mzyxptlk 27 Apr 2010 12:28

Re: Sad change in planetarion history
 
You just made a post on a public forum informing them of such.

HaNzI 27 Apr 2010 12:32

Re: Sad change in planetarion history
 
Prove that we were able to cover the incs you call farming

Mzyxptlk 27 Apr 2010 12:37

Re: Sad change in planetarion history
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by EULA
(a) Attacking a target with his/her consent to get his/her asteroids/ships

Consent is the only requirement.

Quote:

Originally Posted by HaNzI (Post 3191122)
"We will (...) let Newdawn land on us for free"


HaNzI 27 Apr 2010 12:42

Re: Sad change in planetarion history
 
There is no planet to planet agreement on landing anyone, we are just making everyone aware of that our political agenda is stopping Vision.
We accept that the cost for this will be newdawn landing on us for free, as a result to all fleets being tied up to defend against vision.

His/her consent is in no way tied to any political statements from an alliance.

booji 27 Apr 2010 12:43

Re: Sad change in planetarion history
 
It is not like the MHs have ever seemed to need proof before! or rather they have never seemed to be very consistant in their requirements.

VenoX 27 Apr 2010 12:45

Re: Sad change in planetarion history
 
Does this include the apprimes in 8:3 when they get home from vacation?

[B5]Londo 27 Apr 2010 12:47

Re: Sad change in planetarion history
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by HaNzI (Post 3191139)
His/her consent is in no way tied to any political statements from an alliance.

well it would be if it could be found whether they voted on that particular poll to be roided, but thankfully we can't.
Im not seeing this as politically very wise though, it encourages ND while only pissing VsN off more imo.

booji 27 Apr 2010 12:47

Re: Sad change in planetarion history
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by HaNzI (Post 3191122)
So tomorrow i hope every single planet from Newdawn participate in attacking Apprime, landing early might be a good idea for the best caps, but if not Vision will flak you.

Quote:

Originally Posted by HaNzI (Post 3191122)
We accept that the cost for this will be newdawn landing on us for free, as a result to all fleets being tied up to defend against vision.

contradiction... if ND are launching first you will not yet be tied up defending against vsn.

HaNzI 27 Apr 2010 12:50

Re: Sad change in planetarion history
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by booji (Post 3191143)
contradiction... if ND are launching first you will not yet be tied up defending against vsn.

In a 8 hour window, our alliance decides where our fleets are best used. If we choose to defend against the incs that shows 0400 instead of the incs that shows 0100, that is entirely up to us. We know that the incs will be impossible to cover, and the only thing we can do is choose who gets def or not.

Patrikc 27 Apr 2010 12:51

Re: Sad change in planetarion history
 
The roiding of [Nitz] (which used about 60 fleets including launch/recalls) very much felt like a declaration of war - Apprime was going to roid each of our top planets one by one.

The fact that there were 4 other alliances aching to get a stab at you is anything but our fault. Perhaps you shouldn't run your politics through intimidation.

And don't tell me carDi wouldn't have put up wave after wave on Dimentus anyway to ensure his own win. :)

HaNzI 27 Apr 2010 12:51

Re: Sad change in planetarion history
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by VenoX (Post 3191141)
Does this include the apprimes in 8:3 when they get home from vacation?

Apprimes in 8:3 will of course be protected under any circumstances.

HaNzI 27 Apr 2010 12:57

Re: Sad change in planetarion history
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Patrikc (Post 3191146)
The roiding of [Nitz] (which used about 60 fleets including launch/recalls) very much felt like a declaration of war - Apprime was going to roid each of our top planets one by one.

The fact that there were 4 other alliances aching to get a stab at you is anything but our fault. Perhaps you shouldn't run your politics through intimidation.

And don't tell me carDi wouldn't have put up wave after wave on Dimentus anyway to ensure his own win. :)

The formal agreement was that all Vision planets in Apprime gals would not get any incs. So what if we used 60 launches on him, that was because he was a fat target in a galraid, and we could not deny our members a chance to roid him if they wanted to.


edit: if we wanted to roid dimentus we would have roided him instead of [nitz] DUH.

t3k 27 Apr 2010 13:05

Re: Sad change in planetarion history
 
How is this a win?

Surely you should see this as "Despite the fact that we're not challenging for the win, the entire universe still thinks we're dicks".

Surely you're doing something fundementally wrong if people are bashing you just for the sake of bashing you?

Also, for those interested, if you rearrange 'fundemenally' you get Daft Null Enemy. I just felt that was equally applicable to Apprime.

Patrikc 27 Apr 2010 13:06

Re: Sad change in planetarion history
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by HaNzI (Post 3191148)
edit: if we wanted to roid dimentus we would have roided him instead of [nitz] DUH.

Ah right I forgot, you can't roid more than one planet per round of Planetarion!

DeeJay 27 Apr 2010 13:22

Re: Sad change in planetarion history
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by HaNzI (Post 3191147)
Apprimes in 8:3 will of course be protected under any circumstances.

Not that you can do a damn thing about it.

JonnyBGood 27 Apr 2010 13:49

Re: Sad change in planetarion history
 
This all happened for a few reasons. Primary among these was the fact that cardi, and apprime as a whole, went around and pissed off nearly every single person in the universe. NAPing DLR, the first real political move of the round (as it led to further co-operation), was a stagnatory move designed to secure Apprime. Speaking as someone in an alliance with only a few more players and in a much precarious base position (ie fortress galaxies) I felt this was a shit move. Then we had the targeting of Ascendancy and then ND. After that we had the mass waving of Vision's second biggest planet by apprime. And then we had apprime members telling anyone who would care to listen that although they were "okay" with VsN winning the round, and for the record I also heard a number of rumours that cardi was running around trying to find people who'd hit vsn with him, apprime would have the top planets. Finally we had the reaction to the planned attack on 8.3, cardi/reese/eksero go into vacation in a move that fairly obviously had little to do with vacation alongside cardi pming every single involved HC with both threats* that apprime would kill them with x, y and z other alliances if they didn't back out and help apprime hit whoever.

I actually had a conversation with cardi like 3 weeks ago where I told him that a fairly likely outcome of the amount of shit he was talking was the entire universe gang****ing either him, his galaxy, apprime or all 3. This has pretty much transpired. Personally I think it's well deserved. If you want to talk that much shit about everyone else you need to be able to back it up.


For the record the idea that cardi wouldn't have roided dmnts regardless if he was close with 1/2 days to go is laughable.


*Seriously, who the **** thinks this is a good way to run politics? I know for a fact that cardi pmed heimdall threatening to ptarget oddr after heimdall posted on AD and said that oddr had gotten incs off them.

BlueArmy 27 Apr 2010 13:52

Re: Sad change in planetarion history
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by DeeJay (Post 3191152)
Not that you can do a damn thing about it.

sure they can.. let them stay in protection for the rest of the round!!!
they just need to come up with a very good excuse when they are supposed to be forced out of vacation..

"but people are going to attack us, and we want to keep hiding :'/ "

Apprime brought this on themselves, or more truthfully, cardi/eksero/reese brought this on Apprime. People only wanted to hit 8:3 as they got a free shot at top gal and planets, atleast thats my understanding. When they went into vacation lead by cardi, people got annoyed with Apprime and took out their frustration on them.

And for the crap you're saying about VSN is just lame. SO RIGHT, WE'RE NOT GONNA ATTACK EACH OTHER. WE'RE JUST GONNA ROID ONE OF YOUR TOP PLANETS, I'M SURE THATS FINE WITH YOU..

cardi would have hit dimentus with every single fleet in Apprime if that was needed to get him #1, and he surely will now when he gets back from the beach with his newfound tan...

I really wonder how the mood is in Apprime, considering everyone in there have to take the fall because of the selfishness of 3 people..
I'd be pissed if it was me, but then again I'm not a lithbot, so I actually have my own opinions..

rikavela 27 Apr 2010 13:57

Re: Sad change in planetarion history
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by JonnyBGood (Post 3191154)
This all happened for a few reasons. Primary among these was the fact that cardi, and apprime as a whole, went around and pissed off nearly every single person in the universe. NAPing DLR, the first real political move of the round (as it led to further co-operation), was a stagnatory move designed to secure Apprime. Speaking as someone in an alliance with only a few more players and in a much precarious base position (ie fortress galaxies) I felt this was a shit move. Then we had the targeting of Ascendancy and then ND. After that we had the mass waving of Vision's second biggest planet by apprime. And then we had apprime members telling anyone who would care to listen that although they were "okay" with VsN winning the round, and for the record I also heard a number of rumours that cardi was running around trying to find people who'd hit vsn with him, apprime would have the top planets. Finally we had the reaction to the planned attack on 8.3, cardi/reese/eksero go into vacation in a move that fairly obviously had little to do with vacation alongside cardi pming every single involved HC with both threats* that apprime would kill them with x, y and z other alliances if they didn't back out and help apprime hit whoever.

I actually had a conversation with cardi like 3 weeks ago where I told him that a fairly likely outcome of the amount of shit he was talking was the entire universe gang****ing either him, his galaxy, apprime or all 3. This has pretty much transpired. Personally I think it's well deserved. If you want to talk that much shit about everyone else you need to be able to back it up.


For the record the idea that cardi wouldn't have roided dmnts regardless if he was close with 1/2 days to go is laughable.


*Seriously, who the **** thinks this is a good way to run politics? I know for a fact that cardi pmed heimdall threatening to ptarget oddr after heimdall posted on AD and said that oddr had gotten incs off them.


Cardi says : "once again when you talk for me, give some facts instead of bullshiting like you always do about me".

berten 27 Apr 2010 13:59

Re: Sad change in planetarion history
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by rikavela (Post 3191156)
Cardi says : "once again when you talk for me, give some facts instead of bullshiting like you always do about me".

Tell cardi he might want to rephrase that (seems abit odd that JBG wld be talking for Cardi etc)

Linkie 27 Apr 2010 14:12

Re: Sad change in planetarion history
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by HaNzI (Post 3191147)
Apprimes in 8:3 will of course be protected under any circumstances.

So the planets that completely deserts your alliance for 3 days are going to be protected with everything you got?

HaNzI 27 Apr 2010 14:14

Re: Sad change in planetarion history
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Linkie (Post 3191159)
So the planets that completely deserts your alliance for 3 days are going to be protected with everything you got?

Of course.

rikavela 27 Apr 2010 14:14

Re: Sad change in planetarion history
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Linkie (Post 3191159)
So the planets that completely deserts your alliance for 3 days are going to be protected with everything you got?

Oh look, someone is trying to cause us internal troubles. How cunning! FK CARDI I DONT WANNA DEF YOUR PLANET! LETS RAPE VSN INSTEAD :D

Cronix 27 Apr 2010 14:28

Re: Sad change in planetarion history
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by BlueArmy (Post 3191155)

I really wonder how the mood is in Apprime, considering everyone in there have to take the fall because of the selfishness of 3 people..
I'd be pissed if it was me, but then again I'm not a lithbot, so I actually have my own opinions..

That is the beauty of lithbots :up:

who the fock needs ppl with opinions to win a war? O_o

Patrikc 27 Apr 2010 14:51

Re: Sad change in planetarion history
 
I'm just amazed that people are still surprised that Apprime gets gangbanged on (and some claiming it is 'unfair'). Like JBG said, you could see it coming weeks ago, especially knowing who's in charge over there.

And instead of trying to defuse a tense situation cardi only made it worse by, guess what, even more threats.

Cronix 27 Apr 2010 15:09

Re: Sad change in planetarion history
 
Im only surprised that Vision shud turn out to be the ally taking the initiative, considering that they had allywin served on a silverplate.

but oh well, maybe we will finally get some goddam action in this horribly boring round :D

Hail Santa

HaNzI 27 Apr 2010 15:26

Re: Sad change in planetarion history
 
Apprime solve their politics in an unorthodox way yes. We often raid top planets and gals just because its a challenge. This round it led to a lot of whining from planets/gals we roided, instead of sucking it up and deal with it. Our response to this whining will always be the same,which is:

Shut the **** up, if you want to have a war because your precious planet lost some rocks, please bring your alliance we will gladly fight you.

We are not afraid of a war, but if a larger tag struggle to fight us then maybe they should just **** off and hit something easier, not run around like crying mamasboys and have everyone else do the job for them.

SUCK IT UP AND PLAY ON!

Abort 27 Apr 2010 15:55

Re: Sad change in planetarion history
 
This is a good try Apprime... i'll give you that. Trying real hard to get between ND and VsN... your politics aren't as great as you think they are. ND had all intentions of hitting App regardless.

Just can't wait for 8 3 to get out of vacation! ND has some roids in that galaxy that belong to us... (mykool)

LordNieminen 27 Apr 2010 16:04

Re: Sad change in planetarion history
 
Won't change our targetting either whatever you decide, you know.. Apprime all the way whatever you guys decide.

Could not care less about vsn winning and tbh just few days left that score gap is insane unless it goes down to 5mil... it's like 24mil or something atm, so yeah what's the point of this topic.. we'll still hit apprime the ultimate fencers of this round as payback.

HaNzI 27 Apr 2010 16:13

Re: Sad change in planetarion history
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by LordNieminen (Post 3191178)
Won't change our targetting either whatever you decide, you know.. Apprime all the way whatever you guys decide.

Could not care less about vsn winning and tbh just few days left that score gap is insane unless it goes down to 5mil... it's like 24mil or something atm, so yeah what's the point of this topic.. we'll still hit apprime the ultimate fencers of this round as payback.

Payback for what?

Patrikc 27 Apr 2010 16:20

Re: Sad change in planetarion history
 
I would've loved to see Apprime and Vision one on one. I don't think you would've been able to close the gap between us, yet it could have been a close call. But even if we had done this, other alliances would've hit Apprime anyway simply because your arrogance (displayed nicely in HaNzI's post above) has made a lot of enemies.

berten 27 Apr 2010 16:25

Re: Sad change in planetarion history
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by HaNzI (Post 3191179)
Payback for what?

Guess for bringing fencing to an entire new level (funny tbh how you went for fortress gals the last 4 rounds, and now when there are priv galaxies you choose to fence everything)

Maybe for the nap you had with DLR.

Maybe for you abusing this nap and roiding non DLR in DLR galaxies and having the DLR roided by other alliances.

Maybe for Cardi thinking he can threaten everyone and get away with a fenced round win.

Maybe for you being ignorant and thinking this post will lead to anything else then "the entire universe throwing everything on your 48 man alliance" lasting until 8:3 gets out of protection.

Or maybe just because app hit LordN (didn't you?)

Just from the top of my head etc

Cronix 27 Apr 2010 16:26

Re: Sad change in planetarion history
 
Wauw that lack of ambition makes me sad LordN:down:

DigitalZero 27 Apr 2010 16:40

Re: Sad change in planetarion history
 
For the last week or so, APP has been our targets regardless. This is just someone saying they will lay down and take the beating. No matter what APP does, we will continue to hit app with our friendly alliances as we have been over the past few days. What app does, is clearly something that they will do, and will have no influence in/or if we break the VsN nap or not. If we see a win in our grasps, maybe we will take advantage of it, but it will take alot for us to stop our current political agreements.

DeadOps 27 Apr 2010 16:40

Re: Sad change in planetarion history
 
payback for being lame ;)

Stoom 27 Apr 2010 16:53

Re: Sad change in planetarion history
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by rikavela (Post 3191156)
Cardi says : "once again when you talk for me, give some facts instead of bullshiting like you always do about me".

THESTOOM says: "Try to VNC yourself out of this one!"

jelle 27 Apr 2010 16:54

Re: Sad change in planetarion history
 
Is i just me or are all you nd fags missing the point of plz roid us :D

Firebird 27 Apr 2010 18:02

Re: Sad change in planetarion history
 
Takes a man to fight a fight and child to go fetch his friend's yes im looking at u!

Colt 27 Apr 2010 18:05

Re: Sad change in planetarion history
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by HaNzI (Post 3191160)
Of course.

So..which will you defend if 8:3 get incomings and then Vision hit your other planets...somehow i cant see you prioritzing anyone other than 8:3 in that situation...which kind of makes your statement "we will only def versus Vision" redundant, no?

just curious :)

Cronix 27 Apr 2010 18:15

Re: Sad change in planetarion history
 
Theres only one way to find out Colt!

Patrikc 27 Apr 2010 19:19

Re: Sad change in planetarion history
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Firebird (Post 3191191)
Takes a man to fight a fight and child to go fetch his friend's yes im looking at u!

So you're saying a man threatened some children, and you are now upset that the children gang up on him?


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 14:56.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2002 - 2018