[football] barca chelski
**** me, how badly did chelsea get owned in the first half... they looked.... human ;)
in all honesty though, most dangerous player on the pitch: ronaldinho, they should be getting more of the ball to him as there is a player running rings around the people trying to stop him and having a good game at the same time, i like to see a man enjoying his work :) can chelsea score 2 in the second half? i think so, but unless they manage to come up with something to do about ronaldinho, i dont think however many they score will matter. oh, i will say though that i think nealry/all 50/50 decisions have gone barcas was (as far as i have seen anyway, i missed the first 10 mins) |
Re: [football] barca chelski
1-1 was a fair result.
Chelsea didn't make anything tonight for two reasons: 1. Mourinho just got it wrong, both with the starting line up and the substitutions. 2. Robben was absolutely rubbish. I've no idea why Cole was taken off, as Cole created everything good for Chelsea, whereas Robben did nothing. See 1. |
Re: [football] barca chelski
anyone care to speculate how much money Ambramovich would have to shell out to buy Ronaldinho? For a multi-billionaire, it must seem like the obvious answer however much he costs.
Last summer I think it was rumoured Chelsea offered £70-80 million and were turned down. |
Re: [football] barca chelski
Quote:
|
Re: [football] barca chelski
Quote:
What was that penalty all about? Bloody joke, now Mourinho can say the didn't lose etc. |
Re: [football] barca chelski
Quote:
|
Re: [football] barca chelski
He still said '11v11 chelsea would've won'
****ing twat. |
Re: [football] barca chelski
Quote:
|
Re: [football] barca chelski
Ambramovich sold his multi-million oil company. Not surprised considering thousands of people had their homes destroyed due to the pipelines he owned which has inflicted trauma on hundreds. That comes from the time when Sir Alan Sugar came to our school (he lives right next to it at least it used to be his main house - now the fields around it are just used as a Tottenham Hotpsur training ground they seldomly visit)
|
Re: [football] barca chelski
Quote:
|
Re: [football] barca chelski
Quote:
|
Re: [football] barca chelski
Quote:
|
Re: [football] barca chelski
Quote:
I don't base my opinion on what he says. |
Re: [football] barca chelski
Quote:
I still think Terry makes the contact even if Gio doesn't reach the ball but it is difficult to tell if he made contact with the ball from the replay angles. |
Re: [football] barca chelski
apart from the goal
game was like watching paint dry. 2 teams poncing about with possession not doing very much with it. |
Re: [football] barca chelski
Did Chelsea play tonight ?
I hadn't noticed. I was too busy listening to http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/football/4778628.stm |
Re: [football] barca chelski
Lampard and Robben were awful. Terry had an ok game.
It was pretty boring, though. |
Re: [football] barca chelski
Quote:
|
Re: [football] barca chelski
told you so.
barca ftw! \0/ |
Re: [football] barca chelski
Quote:
|
Re: [football] barca chelski
Quote:
hope to meet you lot in the cup next season, i want to make the away trip. |
Re: [football] barca chelski
Ronaldinho has 100million release clause iirc, also
Also when is abramovic going to start asking questions? Surely he should win all 4 trophies? |
Re: [football] barca chelski
|
Re: [football] barca chelski
Quote:
|
Re: [football] barca chelski
it was a penalty, but i dont see how the ref could have seen it tbh :)
ok game, ronadlinho the only outstanding player though, and his goal was very well deserved :) |
Re: [football] barca chelski
Quote:
|
Re: [football] barca chelski
Quote:
Who are they? |
Re: [football] barca chelski
****s sake
EDIT: ****ing useless forums just deleted about half a dozen posts from this thread fs |
Re: [football] barca chelski
Chelski :crymeariver: :crymeariver: :crymeariver: :crymeariver: :crymeariver: :crymeariver: :crymeariver:
What a shame, what a darn shame. |
Re: [football] barca chelski
Quote:
yea now we have to look at Ronaldinho & co. again! :(((((((((( |
Re: [football] barca chelski
Quote:
Why would losing against one of the strongest teams in europe be a shame? |
Re: [football] barca chelski
Because after the talk, and all their money, they couldnt cut it? They dont even entertain, its no wonder people are happy to see them lose.
|
Re: [football] barca chelski
Quote:
People are just bitter. Chelseas spending has been good for the game. It's broken the Man U/Arsenal domination of the Premier League and has created another genuine contender for the European Cup. |
Re: [football] barca chelski
No, but Barcelona entertain.
Breaking the Man Utd / Arsenal axis is probably a good thing, but im not sure it is a good thing _at any cost_. What if Chelsea didnt have the money they do? The title race this year would be good. Man Utd vs Liverpool. Who knows, even Chelsea pre Chelski could have got there on merit. Maybe Tottenham would have kicked on ANOTHER gear. I'm very well aware i'm bitter, i dont deny that. However; As much as i disliked (and still do dislike) Man utd's last minute winner policy that won them so many titles, they were _entertaining_. As much as i disliked (and still do dislike) Arsenal's diving and unbelievable flukery at times, when they were in full flow, they were _entertaining_. What are chelsea? Who's interested in seeing a bunch of souped up london thug fans buy a title and grind out results they probably dont always deserve, irritating everyone in the process? Remember the Pompey fans applauding Arsenal off the pitch when they demolished them? Ask yourself whether that would happen now with Chelsea. I dont think so |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 21:16. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2002 - 2018