A Spore Announcement
Next round will see some familiar faces making a comeback, under the alliance name of Spore, helmed by myself and Bashar. This is NOT 1up, although some of the faces in the alliance will be very familiar to ex-1up (or even ex-Fury) members. Without Sid, there can be no 1up. Whether he makes an appearance; whether he'll use his own nick, we cannot say at this time. But even without his presence, we bring with us the ethos upon which 1up was created - the idea of an alliance built purely for playing on our own terms and pushing the boundaries within the game, whilst maintaining a role to prevent megablocking that leads to stagnation.
One of the biggest differences between us and 1up is that we will not be a full sized tag (to our current predictions), and not going for the #1 position (unless the opportunity presents itself of course). We will enter the next round with no enemies (at least if we are given that choice). The "grudges" from one round to the next is one reason for the never-ending cycle of two blocks forming to fight each other and we will not start with the intention of joining either side or participating in an overwhelming block that will lead to stagnation. Politically for the alliance, we will be open to short-term (and long-term) deals that are in the interests of keeping stagnation at bay and with the thoughts of our members taken into account. Any discussion with myself or Bashar will be treated in the strictest confidence and will not be passed on to anyone else. (This being stated only due to how I have heard discussions are more prone to be passed along) Our public channel is #Spore - recruitment details can be found there. If you want to help us re-raise the bar, or want to talk to us about anything else, get in touch. Lastly, the name Spore was chosen for two reasons. One for it's relationship to that of our former alliance, to being the beginnings (and end) from that of a famours green and white mushroom, the second because GZT100 (Get Zhil Top 100) was refused. |
Re: A Spore Announcement
Good luck. Holla if you need anything.
|
Re: A Spore Announcement
Good luck, Zhil & Basher!
|
Re: A Spore Announcement
I fully endorse this message/product/thing
|
Re: A Spore Announcement
Quote:
|
Re: A Spore Announcement
Quote:
|
Re: A Spore Announcement
Good luck broskis
|
Re: A Spore Announcement
Nice and good luck. I hope well see a new ally fighting tops
|
Re: A Spore Announcement
Good luck Zhil & co.
|
Re: A Spore Announcement
Spore being an annoyingly addictive game on my nokia, can we expect some nice gal pics from u all ?
Good luck guys |
Re: A Spore Announcement
holla!
|
Re: A Spore Announcement
Hola back!
|
Re: A Spore Announcement
Best of luck Spore!
|
Re: A Spore Announcement
This isn't a recruitment thread. It's an alliance announcement, and should be on AD.
|
Re: A Spore Announcement
kenny can u play a round :))
|
Re: A Spore Announcement
Quote:
|
Re: A Spore Announcement
Good luck! Although if you are going to talk about anti stagnation you probably shouldn't bring up Fury or Sid for that matter.
|
Re: A Spore Announcement
Quote:
If you are going to be a smart arse, at least make sure that what you are saying is smart, otherwise you're just being an arse. |
Re: A Spore Announcement
Boom. You just got served.
|
Re: A Spore Announcement
Quote:
That said, it is kind of silly to refer to events that happened 7 or more years ago to criticize a completely different alliance that exists today. |
Re: A Spore Announcement
Quote:
Quote:
|
Re: A Spore Announcement
Sorry to hijack this thread but continuously using the word stagnation in a game which is on the decline is damn right ridiculous, that's if I understand the word correctly but I have googled it etc and im pretty sure it means "standing still"
If people are truly stagnating this game, which is damn near impossible considering the continuous decline in players then I would see it as something we should all strive at before even beginning to talk about growth. Okay maybe I misinterpreted and you only mean stagnating that particular round, a round that has a fixed end... is that even possible? I think the word everyone is looking for is "BORING" but shit me if browser based text games are anything but in todays gaming industry. |
Re: A Spore Announcement
Quote:
Essentially, stagnation means "turning bad because of standing still" rather than just "standing still". |
Re: A Spore Announcement
Quote:
|
Re: A Spore Announcement
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
Re: A Spore Announcement
Quote:
|
Re: A Spore Announcement
Quote:
|
Re: A Spore Announcement
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
Re: A Spore Announcement
Quote:
Unfortunately App/TGV took such a tremendous lead that ND/Fang couldn't stand up to us and so they got more alliances to help them. TGV took a beating but we kept on fighting. Did we think we stagnated the round...possibly but on paper ND/Fang vs App/TGV was a pretty fair fight, we just managed to get a huge lead early on and kept it. Even when CT joined them we still were able to hold our own since the block could only land on us if they all hit us, if only 2 of them did then they couldnt. According to the PA community, they felt we stagnated the round and wanted for us to turn on our ally Apprime. We refused because all that would do is hand the win to some other alliance so why should we give the win to someone else after App/TGV fought hard for it. Anyways if you are wanting to pursue this further I would suggest making a new topic since at this point I would say your straying from the original intent of this thread. |
Re: A Spore Announcement
Quote:
I did apologize for hijacking the thread but when it's only moral grounding is to belittle everyone who has ever played in / ran an alliance I don't see the need for me to open a new thread Quote:
Quote:
|
Re: A Spore Announcement
Oooooo this makes me want to play again!
|
Re: A Spore Announcement
Quote:
1. Everyone is entitled to an opinion and everyone is entitled to have their opinion respected. 2. Discussion is about not only disagreeing with opposing opinions, but also about providing evidence and reasoning as to why you disagree and also the same for why you hold the opinion you do. This should be done in a friendly and respectful manner. 3. Flatly rejecting other people's opinions with nothing but abuse and profanity is not only extremely rude, but also shows a massive degree of arrogance. 4. if you follow the above steps, you will find that not only do people pay more attention to your views, but also that they will not consider you to be an abusive, ignorant trolling fool. It really isn't hard and it is just basic manners. If you want me to respond to your points and further explain my opinions, I am happy to do so once you start showing some respect to others. When you started posting in this thread I went out of my way to help you understand what I had said and to properly answer your questions, yet all you do in return is disrespect my views. Have a think on that before posting again. |
Re: A Spore Announcement
Quote:
Sometimes, in the course of attempting to achieve those goals, they take actions that, as a side effect, harm the long term development of PA. Overblocking is an example. Ruthlessly exiling newbies or people in bad alliances is another. That's not "wrong" in the "1 + 1 = 3" sense of the word, because it helps people achieve their goals. It's not wrong in the "stealing is wrong" sense, either, because it's not banned by the EULA. It could be wrong in the "don't use swear words in front of children" sense, but I bet you're right: it's probably mostly the victims who think that, in order to make themselves feel good and the other side look bad (either intentionally and cynically, or just self-deluding). That said, I don't think we're dealing with a lack of moral fortitude here. If you give people with guns a million bucks every time they shoot someone, you're going to see your murder rate go through the roof, no matter how ethical people are (pretending to be). In this analogy, you'd solve the problem by taking the guns away, but I think that the temptation to be a ruthless **** is caused by aspects of the game mechanics that are inseparable from the core of what makes PA PA. That's unfortunate, because (if correct), that means you can't fix PA. It's either a dog-eat-dog-fest for assholes, or a yawntastic sim-planet-unicorn candy land. |
Re: A Spore Announcement
Quote:
|
Re: A Spore Announcement
Well howdy Zh|l!
|
Re: A Spore Announcement
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
Re: A Spore Announcement
Quote:
btw hello Axis, stop by #spore ;-) on netgamers. |
Re: A Spore Announcement
Good luck, I signed up last round and then forgot to login. I hope you get further than me!
|
Re: A Spore Announcement
Quote:
|
Re: A Spore Announcement
Quote:
|
Re: A Spore Announcement
Stagnation, dominance and boredom is full of win.
Why else would I be married? |
Re: A Spore Announcement
Quote:
|
Re: A Spore Announcement
Quote:
|
Re: A Spore Announcement
How can stagnation be anything but boring?
|
Re: A Spore Announcement
Quote:
|
Re: A Spore Announcement
Hi all!
|
Re: A Spore Announcement
Welcome back KillGhost
|
Re: A Spore Announcement
Quote:
|
Re: A Spore Announcement
Quote:
|
Re: A Spore Announcement
There are few games that have a player base that's actively discouraging other people from playing it. It's really quite amazing.
|
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 22:57. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2002 - 2018