Say goodbye to image searching
http://ecoustics-cnet.com.com/2100-1...ecoustics-cnet
Quote:
|
Re: Say goodbye to image searching
Quote:
|
Re: Say goodbye to image searching
I don't see any major effect but i'll read the judgement
|
Re: Say goodbye to image searching
Quote:
|
Re: Say goodbye to image searching
Quote:
|
Re: Say goodbye to image searching
Quote:
|
Re: Say goodbye to image searching
Quote:
|
Re: Say goodbye to image searching
Quote:
|
Re: Say goodbye to image searching
Quote:
Honestly, some people take it too far. |
Re: Say goodbye to image searching
Was it not 'decided' recently that google's caching of data was 'fair use'? I don't see why text would be different from images in that respect...
[edit] found it: http://news.com.com/2061-10812_3-603...1266&subj=news It seems the decision was made because the suer could have stopped the caching. |
Re: Say goodbye to image searching
they could just buy the rights to the photos from an issue of penthouse and have all image searches respond with a random selection of that set.
suddenly everything is all legal and none of the customers notice the difference. |
Re: Say goodbye to image searching
Quote:
|
Re: Say goodbye to image searching
Quote:
|
Re: Say goodbye to image searching
Quote:
|
Re: Say goodbye to image searching
Quote:
|
Re: Say goodbye to image searching
Quote:
|
Re: Say goodbye to image searching
Quote:
How is Google to determine which pictures are protected and which arent when there are so many of them? |
Re: Say goodbye to image searching
Quote:
you must do extra work for your work to be protected, just like in happens outside of the internet .. |
Re: Say goodbye to image searching
Quote:
|
Re: Say goodbye to image searching
Quote:
|
Re: Say goodbye to image searching
Quote:
|
Re: Say goodbye to image searching
Quote:
society (through it's laws) should protect them for them. |
Re: Say goodbye to image searching
Did anyone read the link I posted? :|
It was decided in Nevada that because of the ability to 'protect' content from google with a robots.txt, that the cacheing of content constituted 'fair use', and wasn't in breach of copyright. Now I realise that Nevada law isn't going to automatically influence the law everywhere else, but it certainly means it isn't as clear cut as it seems Nodrog would have us believe, and that (in some contexts at least) it seems the onus is on the owners to tell search engines to skip over their content. |
Re: Say goodbye to image searching
Right (I wanted to read the bloody thing and check before i posted because it's not my native legal system after all) but the first thing to say is that:
it is just an injunction. it's not determinitive. The case hasn't been won (or lost) yet. The test for getting an injunction is lower than for actually winning in court. Secondly as the article points out (and mark quoted) this is really not going to affect google world wide. |
Re: Say goodbye to image searching
Quote:
When I look at a cache of this site the images all look like they are from pirate.planetarion.com (if I look at the properties of an individual icon for instance). If I look at a cache of a site that is down, generally all I will see is the text of the page, not the images. Quote:
|
Re: Say goodbye to image searching
You are a pretty poor troll Green Spit.
I don't really use Google image search so it doesn't really bother me, when ever I try to enlarge the thumbnails something always goes wrong and the images never work. However, I don't really see what harm Google was causing by having the feature, surely it just generated additional traffic for the website since inorder to enlarge the image you have to see view the page it's on |
Re: Say goodbye to image searching
are people complaining about google storing the images, or google providing thumbnails (with an associated quality loss)?
either way, i expect google to win. |
Re: Say goodbye to image searching
How many appeals can Google try after this in the US system?
|
Re: Say goodbye to image searching
Quote:
the case was brought against google by a site called perfect 10 or something, and it was to stop google caching images which had been pirated from there and featured on other sites, quite frankly, its ****ing ridiculous that the judge expects google to be responsible for someone elses copyright violation |
Re: Say goodbye to image searching
Quote:
|
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 17:12. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2002 - 2018