failing hard
well as a ct member i must like fang but tbh they suck ,irvine nothing personal dude but ur just like claudio ranieri ur a silver guy wont ever be able to go for gold, im really wondering how ultores have fleets to attack ct if u gyes are supposdly attaking them also ,
i wanna state that new alliances need to come out also and make a statement not just play a round for the fact of playing (innuendo) like i say if u dont play to win dont bother playing , same for tgv ,i was impressed how by attaking my gal apprime and ultores where speared are u also cooperating with them? arriving to the xvx oh god chimpie get a life and do somthing in a round other than p targeting ct fsss all that being said major alliances hc have brainaids ,although nd shocked me at least they had balls to war apprime and im really sad to say this but untill know cardi is doing the best politics for the past 2 rounds |
Re: failing hard
[/emo]
|
Re: failing hard
Quote:
|
Re: failing hard
Quote:
|
Re: failing hard
Nelito you mad bro?
You sure its not just ult and fang cancel each other out and whatever fleets they have left they come to cap back their losses from CT because CT won't ground and the defence is not what it used to be? A fair few fang attack fleets have had to be recalled before launching due to heavy incs etc so i guess bud that its just you guys leak roids whereas fang leak less. OOOOR its that everyone is indeed crap and ult are the best alliance in the world! |
Re: failing hard
Fang + CT cancel out ult, you mean.
Still to see this "1v1" fang keep banging on about.. |
Re: failing hard
Quote:
|
Re: failing hard
Quote:
|
Re: failing hard
Quote:
|
Re: failing hard
like i stated earlier fang holy war on ultores (DAM I CANNOT PASTE LINKS TO SCANS ) 2 9 2 ATTAKING DOFFEH
thats fang t1 target. nice job guyes keep attaking hr |
Re: failing hard
at least this post has made forums slightly more exciting this round :up::up::up:
|
Re: failing hard
Quote:
|
Re: failing hard
No Wonder SLeepless left that shit hole alliance CT aint what it use to be GM TAME Your SHEEP they are talking back
|
Re: failing hard
Quote:
|
Re: failing hard
Quote:
|
Re: failing hard
Quote:
|
Re: failing hard
When did Ultores backstab? When in the last 5 rounds did CT, for that matter?
|
Re: failing hard
Quote:
|
Re: failing hard
Quote:
Give up, ultores threw away the chance at a 1v1, not us, end of story :) |
Re: failing hard
Quote:
|
Re: failing hard
I would be lieing if I said it wasnt Fangs intention to spend the round warring Ultores anyway, we want to win, you guys are the champions, who else we gonna fight? Its a challenge, we like challenges!
But we certainly didnt start any block building, that has to be said, i hope its clear our intentions of challenging ultores are honourable in that respect! Im looking forward to the end of this round and sleeping. |
Re: failing hard
Quote:
|
Re: failing hard
Quote:
As for Fang, they shouldn't be criticised for not playing one on one, any more than Ultores should. The game just doesn't work that way. |
Re: failing hard
Quote:
|
Re: failing hard
Colt then you where the one who did it weren't you fang HC at the time freaking rats everywhere
|
Re: failing hard
Quote:
|
Re: failing hard
Quote:
|
Re: failing hard
Quote:
I amazes me that CT still believes they can bash around on the smaller alliances for 700 ticks and then don't figure out why they're fighting back. |
Re: failing hard
Would anyone in CT even notice if xVx hit them? ;)
(That's meant to be a joke - not an invitation). We've only just stopped hitting Ult (after 5 or more unprofitable nights) so I've no idea where you get the idea that we've been bashing the smaller alliances. |
Re: failing hard
Quote:
|
Re: failing hard
Quote:
(seeing as B-butcher was refering to the round after then its of no consequence anyway) Please try again. |
Re: failing hard
yeah sorry we wanted fang to win, you wanted to suck ultores c***
|
Re: failing hard
Nelito's ego is too big to agree with anything any HC do in any alliance, unless it's him running an alliance named after himself, of course.
Also we need a new thread titled "Fang, CT and App." Who's on it?? |
Re: failing hard
Quote:
|
Re: failing hard
Quote:
|
Re: failing hard
Quote:
IT COULD HAVE HAPPENED! |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:13. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2002 - 2018