Planetarion Forums

Planetarion Forums (https://pirate.planetarion.com/index.php)
-   Alliance Discussions (https://pirate.planetarion.com/forumdisplay.php?f=38)
-   -   failing hard (https://pirate.planetarion.com/showthread.php?t=199889)

nelito 15 Nov 2012 15:15

failing hard
 
well as a ct member i must like fang but tbh they suck ,irvine nothing personal dude but ur just like claudio ranieri ur a silver guy wont ever be able to go for gold, im really wondering how ultores have fleets to attack ct if u gyes are supposdly attaking them also ,

i wanna state that new alliances need to come out also and make a statement not just play a round for the fact of playing (innuendo)
like i say if u dont play to win dont bother playing ,
same for tgv ,i was impressed how by attaking my gal apprime and ultores where speared are u also cooperating with them?

arriving to the xvx oh god chimpie get a life and do somthing in a round other than p targeting ct fsss

all that being said major alliances hc have brainaids ,although nd shocked me at least they had balls to war apprime
and im really sad to say this but untill know cardi is doing the best politics for the past 2 rounds

Clouds 15 Nov 2012 15:22

Re: failing hard
 
[/emo]

Influence 15 Nov 2012 15:38

Re: failing hard
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by nelito (Post 3220090)
same for tgv ,i was impressed how by attaking my gal apprime and ultores where speared are u also cooperating with them

no we just had shit claiming that night and for some reason the CT targets are allways the first to go (i am sure it has nothing to do with their awesome def tho)

BloodyButcher 15 Nov 2012 15:39

Re: failing hard
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by nelito (Post 3220090)
well as a ct member i must like fang but tbh they suck ,irvine nothing personal dude but ur just like claudio ranieri ur a silver guy wont ever be able to go for gold, im really wondering how ultores have fleets to attack ct if u gyes are supposdly attaking them also ,

i wanna state that new alliances need to come out also and make a statement not just play a round for the fact of playing (innuendo)
like i say if u dont play to win dont bother playing ,
same for tgv ,i was impressed how by attaking my gal apprime and ultores where speared are u also cooperating with them?

arriving to the xvx oh god chimpie get a life and do somthing in a round other than p targeting ct fsss

all that being said major alliances hc have brainaids ,although nd shocked me at least they had balls to war apprime
and im really sad to say this but untill know cardi is doing the best politics for the past 2 rounds

Erm, what are you on about now?

Sebos 15 Nov 2012 16:57

Re: failing hard
 
Nelito you mad bro?

You sure its not just ult and fang cancel each other out and whatever fleets they have left they come to cap back their losses from CT because CT won't ground and the defence is not what it used to be?

A fair few fang attack fleets have had to be recalled before launching due to heavy incs etc so i guess bud that its just you guys leak roids whereas fang leak less.

OOOOR its that everyone is indeed crap and ult are the best alliance in the world!

Trunks 15 Nov 2012 17:15

Re: failing hard
 
Fang + CT cancel out ult, you mean.

Still to see this "1v1" fang keep banging on about..

baggy 15 Nov 2012 17:56

Re: failing hard
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by nelito (Post 3220090)
well as a ct member i must like fang but tbh they suck ,irvine nothing personal dude but ur just like claudio ranieri ur a silver guy wont ever be able to go for gold, im really wondering how ultores have fleets to attack ct if u gyes are supposdly attaking them also ,

i wanna state that new alliances need to come out also and make a statement not just play a round for the fact of playing (innuendo)
like i say if u dont play to win dont bother playing ,
same for tgv ,i was impressed how by attaking my gal apprime and ultores where speared are u also cooperating with them?

arriving to the xvx oh god chimpie get a life and do somthing in a round other than p targeting ct fsss

all that being said major alliances hc have brainaids ,although nd shocked me at least they had balls to war apprime
and im really sad to say this but untill know cardi is doing the best politics for the past 2 rounds

where is lionet btw?

CBA 15 Nov 2012 20:29

Re: failing hard
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sebos (Post 3220094)
Nelito you mad bro?


Connovar 15 Nov 2012 21:35

Re: failing hard
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Trunks (Post 3220095)
Fang + CT cancel out ult, you mean.

Still to see this "1v1" fang keep banging on about..

Ultores put that to bed im afraid, your choice, not ours!

nelito 15 Nov 2012 23:03

Re: failing hard
 
like i stated earlier fang holy war on ultores (DAM I CANNOT PASTE LINKS TO SCANS ) 2 9 2 ATTAKING DOFFEH

thats fang t1 target. nice job guyes keep attaking hr

tobyy 15 Nov 2012 23:56

Re: failing hard
 
at least this post has made forums slightly more exciting this round :up::up::up:

Blue_Esper 16 Nov 2012 03:46

Re: failing hard
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Connovar (Post 3220107)
Ultores put that to bed im afraid, your choice, not ours!

Be the better man/alliance then?

Barrack_Obama 16 Nov 2012 04:42

Re: failing hard
 
No Wonder SLeepless left that shit hole alliance CT aint what it use to be GM TAME Your SHEEP they are talking back

Hiall 16 Nov 2012 10:18

Re: failing hard
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by nelito (Post 3220111)
like i stated earlier fang holy war on ultores (DAM I CANNOT PASTE LINKS TO SCANS ) 2 9 2 ATTAKING DOFFEH

thats fang t1 target. nice job guyes keep attaking hr

Clearly our number one target to crash is cha! Just like losing value at his to cap!

Trunks 16 Nov 2012 10:19

Re: failing hard
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Connovar (Post 3220107)
Ultores put that to bed im afraid, your choice, not ours!

Or did you just realise you lacked what it takes to 1v1? I'd watch out for CT mind.. They have a tendency for putting knives in backs.

BloodyButcher 16 Nov 2012 10:30

Re: failing hard
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Trunks (Post 3220117)
Or did you just realise you lacked what it takes to 1v1? I'd watch out for CT mind.. They have a tendency for putting knives in backs.

I thought that was how Ultores was rolling? They are real knife men.

Mzyxptlk 16 Nov 2012 10:39

Re: failing hard
 
When did Ultores backstab? When in the last 5 rounds did CT, for that matter?

BloodyButcher 16 Nov 2012 10:51

Re: failing hard
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mzyxptlk (Post 3220119)
When did Ultores backstab? When in the last 5 rounds did CT, for that matter?

Heimdall did feel that Ultores backstabbed last round, and for sure Ultores backstabbed FAnG in r46(?). Thats just the alliances ive been a apart of though.

Connovar 16 Nov 2012 11:21

Re: failing hard
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Trunks (Post 3220117)
Or did you just realise you lacked what it takes to 1v1? I'd watch out for CT mind.. They have a tendency for putting knives in backs.

No, but we did realise ult were too chicken to accept the challenge, and instead got 3 friends to come beat us up!

Give up, ultores threw away the chance at a 1v1, not us, end of story :)

Blue_Esper 16 Nov 2012 14:04

Re: failing hard
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by connovar (Post 3220121)
no, but we did realise ult were too chicken to accept the challenge, and instead got 3 friends to come beat us up!

Give up, ultores threw away the chance at a 1v1, not us, end of story :)

you started it!

Connovar 16 Nov 2012 14:12

Re: failing hard
 
I would be lieing if I said it wasnt Fangs intention to spend the round warring Ultores anyway, we want to win, you guys are the champions, who else we gonna fight? Its a challenge, we like challenges!

But we certainly didnt start any block building, that has to be said, i hope its clear our intentions of challenging ultores are honourable in that respect!

Im looking forward to the end of this round and sleeping.

BloodyButcher 16 Nov 2012 14:26

Re: failing hard
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Blue_Esper (Post 3220122)
you started it!

It was pretty clear when we had the member meeting that our intention was to be political neutral. Seeing that we were the only one out of Ult and FAnG who had that idea, we were forced into trying to gather some help fighting your block.

Shev 16 Nov 2012 14:28

Re: failing hard
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by BloodyButcher (Post 3220124)
It was pretty clear when we had the member meeting that our intention was to be political neutral.

I love how you get proved wrong by the post directly before yours. Even with the benefit of hindsight you are incapable of posting something that isn't nonsense.

As for Fang, they shouldn't be criticised for not playing one on one, any more than Ultores should. The game just doesn't work that way.

Colt 16 Nov 2012 20:26

Re: failing hard
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by BloodyButcher (Post 3220120)
Heimdall did feel that Ultores backstabbed last round, and for sure Ultores backstabbed FAnG in r46(?). Thats just the alliances ive been a apart of though.

In regards to the ult backstabbing FAnG, i hope your not referring to the 1st rd FAnG was back (think it was that rd??)....?? The only ones who "backstabbed" there was FAnG, not Ultores..

Barrack_Obama 17 Nov 2012 02:49

Re: failing hard
 
Colt then you where the one who did it weren't you fang HC at the time freaking rats everywhere

Connovar 17 Nov 2012 04:21

Re: failing hard
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Barrack_Obama (Post 3220140)
Colt then you where the one who did it weren't you fang HC at the time freaking rats everywhere

Owned.

BloodyButcher 17 Nov 2012 04:25

Re: failing hard
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Colt (Post 3220135)
In regards to the ult backstabbing FAnG, i hope your not referring to the 1st rd FAnG was back (think it was that rd??)....?? The only ones who "backstabbed" there was FAnG, not Ultores..

No i was referign to the round after that one

DrunkenViking 17 Nov 2012 11:55

Re: failing hard
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by nelito (Post 3220090)
arriving to the xvx oh god chimpie get a life and do somthing in a round other than p targeting ct fsss

Firstly i'm not HC'ing. Secondly CT has sent 90% more hostile fleets on xVx than any other alliance, so if xVx hits CT and you don't like it you might want to think about why.

I amazes me that CT still believes they can bash around on the smaller alliances for 700 ticks and then don't figure out why they're fighting back.

ArcChas 17 Nov 2012 18:38

Re: failing hard
 
Would anyone in CT even notice if xVx hit them? ;)
(That's meant to be a joke - not an invitation).

We've only just stopped hitting Ult (after 5 or more unprofitable nights) so I've no idea where you get the idea that we've been bashing the smaller alliances.

HeimdallR 17 Nov 2012 21:38

Re: failing hard
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by BloodyButcher (Post 3220120)
Heimdall did feel that Ultores backstabbed last round, and for sure Ultores backstabbed FAnG in r46(?). Thats just the alliances ive been a apart of though.

No worries I'll have my revenge , in this round or in another :D

Colt 18 Nov 2012 18:11

Re: failing hard
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Barrack_Obama (Post 3220140)
Colt then you where the one who did it weren't you fang HC at the time freaking rats everywhere

Indeed I was, but I was against the move and so resigned as HC, Irv & co were too influenced by what CT wanted, so no, I didn't do that move :)

(seeing as B-butcher was refering to the round after then its of no consequence anyway)

Please try again.

[DDK]gm 18 Nov 2012 20:58

Re: failing hard
 
yeah sorry we wanted fang to win, you wanted to suck ultores c***

Stylez1877 18 Nov 2012 21:21

Re: failing hard
 
Nelito's ego is too big to agree with anything any HC do in any alliance, unless it's him running an alliance named after himself, of course.

Also we need a new thread titled "Fang, CT and App." Who's on it??

Mzyxptlk 18 Nov 2012 21:33

Re: failing hard
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Stylez1877 (Post 3220165)
Nelito's ego is too big to agree with anything any HC do in any alliance, unless it's him running an alliance named after himself, of course.

And when it's an alliance he's running, it either dies pre-round or kicks him out halfway through. Pretty funny. :)

Colt 19 Nov 2012 19:59

Re: failing hard
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by [DDK]gm (Post 3220164)
yeah sorry we wanted fang to win, you wanted to suck ultores c***

Ult had already won the round, I wanted us to go for planet ranks and have a good end of round (ie go after xVx), you just wanted us to hit Ult so they didn't focus on you...sorry for not wanting to play to another alliances tune...if anyone was "sucking c***" that round it was you & Irv...

Wouter 19 Nov 2012 20:39

Re: failing hard
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Colt (Post 3220176)
Ult had already won the round, I wanted us to go for planet ranks and have a good end of round (ie go after xVx), you just wanted us to hit Ult so they didn't focus on you...sorry for not wanting to play to another alliances tune...if anyone was "sucking c***" that round it was you & Irv...

Well colt, if ult was ct.. and fang was ult...
IT COULD HAVE HAPPENED!


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:13.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2002 - 2018