Britain tops world human rights abuses: Amnesty
Link
Herald Reporter BRITAIN continues to lead the world in human rights violations, using the September 11 bombings of the United States of America and London bombings as a smokescreen, Amnesty International has reported. AI said the new security legislation, in the wake of the 11 September and London attacks in the USA, had opened floodgates to human rights violations perpetrated by the UK through paramilitary shootings, beatings and sectarian attacks, especially in Northern Ireland and Afghanistan. The European Court of Human Rights, said AI, recently ruled that the United Kingdom (UK) had violated the right to life in Northern Ireland. "There was an increase in paramilitary killings and shootings in Northern Ireland. The authorities failed to bring prosecutions in a number of controversial cases of deaths in custody in England. "There were inadequate safeguards to prevent the suicide of young people in prisons,’’ says A1. To date, A1 has documented cases of discriminatory practices in relation to deaths in police custody, detention, ill-treatment, investigations into racists killings and attacks and other aspects of the criminal justice system. In the aftermath of the September 11 bombings, the UK is said to have derogated from Article 5 (1) of the European Convention on Human Rights and Article 9 of the International Convenant on Civil and Political Rights in order to allow for indefinite administrative detention. What has worsened the situation in the UK, AI said, is the fact that under the Act, the Secretary of State may order such detention, without charge or trial and without recourse to judicial review, of any non-UK national deemed a suspected "international terrorist and national security risk" on the basis of reasonable suspicion. AI also attacked the UK for trying to radically overhaul the asylum system and for not ratifying the United Nations Optional Protocol on the involvement of children as child soldiers. Amnesty International also said prisoners were being ill-treated so much that the conviction of three prison officers in the UK, was a tip of the iceberg. Despite racists treatment in the prisons, the AI, said the UK had not done anything to safeguard prisoners from committing suicide in detention. "There was inadequate safeguards to prevent prisoners from committing suicide. In April the European Court of Human Rights found that the UK had violated provisions of the Europena Convention of Human Rights by allowing suicide to take places in its prison, without making any effort to combat it." |
Re: Britain tops world human rights abuses: Amnesty
yes.
leading the world. exactly. :rolleyes: |
Re: Britain tops world human rights abuses: Amnesty
zimbabwe is hardly a credible news source.
Quote:
if you believe Mugabe et all - Texan, then you have some serious problems. Though im inclined to think you have problems anyway with your blind-faith in the neo-conservative agenda. Do tell - do you nod along to everything fox news says to you? Are you truely a blind sheep, following anything the bush administration says without question? |
Re: Britain tops world human rights abuses: Amnesty
|
Re: Britain tops world human rights abuses: Amnesty
|
Re: Britain tops world human rights abuses: Amnesty
I find that truly remarkable.
We're often told about propaganda and we can all laugh about it in the history books but it's rather different when you see it like that. |
Re: Britain tops world human rights abuses: Amnesty
|
Re: Britain tops world human rights abuses: Amnesty
www.theuknews.com
provence.angloinfo.com www.bignewsnetwork.com Well the story is hosted on what we refer to as "the big three" news networks. So it must be some what credible. True JBG, it is a brilliant example of propaganda we have often learnt about in books. Fair enough it is more transparent that most, but on close inspection of our own press from the last decade I am sure you could find some examples that are just as fine. |
Re: Britain tops world human rights abuses: Amnesty
do you not see the difference between the original article and the one you just posted?
|
Re: Britain tops world human rights abuses: Amnesty
:rolleyes:
EDIT: oh and can't somebody just ban him? this is going to get worse before it gets better. |
Re: Britain tops world human rights abuses: Amnesty
|
Re: Britain tops world human rights abuses: Amnesty
"There were inadequate safeguards to prevent the suicide of young people in prisons,’’ says A1.
I can't see why the people of Zimbabwe could care what A1 would have to say about human rights. They have abused so many with their bad taste and lack of talent. http://images-eu.amazon.com/images/P...CMZZZZZZZ_.jpg :( |
Re: Britain tops world human rights abuses: Amnesty
Quote:
|
Re: Britain tops world human rights abuses: Amnesty
Quote:
I'm sure it must be Blair's fault, aided of course by all the heartless British lawyers. |
Re: Britain tops world human rights abuses: Amnesty
Of course he sees the difference.
The Zimbabwe report obviously overblows things as they have a political point to make. Once again, Texan uses this to "prove" his political point. Badly. Because he's trolling again. Once again, I give you the choice of deciding whether he's a troll or an ignoramus (so far the balance of my feedback comments suggest people would like him branded a trolling ignoramus). Now to make the mistake of answering his "arguments": The much more objective reports on the Amnesty site don't tell us anything we, the British public, don't already know. We are aware of what's going on, and we don't like it. The most high profile of the violations, the shooting of Jean Charles, has been widely and heavily criticised in the press and denounced by the public. If it doesn't lead to prosecutions there will be further backlash. Britain is not perfect, and the Labour government is making it less so on a daily basis. However, it is far from the worst offender when compared to various African dictatorships, or The USA. (Further reading on this matter here and here). The boat to sensationalize this left months ago, and you missed it. Try to troll on something vaguely current next time. |
Re: Britain tops world human rights abuses: Amnesty
Quote:
:bigbrother: |
Re: Britain tops world human rights abuses: Amnesty
evict him then :P
|
Re: Britain tops world human rights abuses: Amnesty
wait till dda get's back off holiday.
he might listen to dda. |
Re: Britain tops world human rights abuses: Amnesty
Quote:
|
Re: Britain tops world human rights abuses: Amnesty
Code:
+-------------------+ .:\:\:/:/:. |
Re: Britain tops world human rights abuses: Amnesty
Clearly the honest unbiased news reporting from Zimbabwe's government controlled news missed the real story.Perfectly placed to level criticism of human rights abuses.
|
Re: Britain tops world human rights abuses: Amnesty
|
Re: Britain tops world human rights abuses: Amnesty
hehe. i see someone has a sense of humour today re: avatar :)
|
Re: Britain tops world human rights abuses: Amnesty
Texan... Im confused. Do you really believe that your country has violated fewer human rights than the British? I actually find this incredible to believe. Our police officers shot dead one man just a few days after the worst terrorists to hit britain since the IRA (and even the IRA gave warnings so that people could be evacuated). Tensions were clearly high and as yet there is no stated reasons for the shooting taking place. I suggest you wait until the investigation has come to its conclusions before you make any judgements (unless, of course, you have a far superior knowledge of the situation than the IPCC, as you seem to believe). Of course, american police officers NEVER shoot people. Ever. It's true, you know! I will only bother mentioning Guantanamo as a reminder. No need to go into details there.
Please, please, please stop this insane drivel you are spouting of late. You didn't used to be so bad. You were always a bit dim when it came to your nationalism and complete disrespect for other countries, but this is far below what you have written before (although the thread about how america is the greatest country in the world, created by you a while ago, does entertain me still). I suggest that if you do not, you will simply herald an irrefutable dislike amongst pretty much every member of these boards, and as such any posts that you will make in the future will be treated less with scepticism and more with contempt. I certainly will see what you write in future as uninformed pap, no matter what you write. You have just shown that you don't know enough and don't have the level of maturity required to be a member of an international forum. There are 15 year olds on this board who are more informed about current affairs and world politics than you. How old are you, out of curiosity? If you are anything older than sixteen I will truly be surprised. I'll leave you with one piece of advise. Either get your act together sharpish and start making decent posts or leave these boards. If you do neither, I can't see you enjoying it here (even crashtester has not completely dismissed the notion that he is shit - and he hasnt been too shit for months!). You will lose all respect for you. You have lost all respect from me. What little you I had for you, anyway. |
Re: Britain tops world human rights abuses: Amnesty
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
Re: Britain tops world human rights abuses: Amnesty
Quote:
Quote:
Nope didnt think so. Quote:
Quote:
|
Re: Britain tops world human rights abuses: Amnesty
Point taken, repper. Had a silly moment :-)
Quote:
|
Re: Britain tops world human rights abuses: Amnesty
this all depends on how you define 'human rights abuses' though.
yawn. |
Re: Britain tops world human rights abuses: Amnesty
Quote:
|
Re: Britain tops world human rights abuses: Amnesty
Quote:
|
Re: Britain tops world human rights abuses: Amnesty
Quote:
|
Re: Britain tops world human rights abuses: Amnesty
Flav.
He didn't do it for an informed debate, or he wouldn't have linked to the Zimbabwe version of the story. The plan was to find the most inflamatory take on it that he could and then watch the fun. T-R-O-L-L |
Re: Britain tops world human rights abuses: Amnesty
Quote:
You also seem to have missed the point of my post. You asked why we were unhappy with this post of Texans. I answered this. You didnt ask how credible the article was or why texan posted the article. So don't 'so?' me, Flavius! |
Re: Britain tops world human rights abuses: Amnesty
Quote:
you appear to be getting confused. |
Re: Britain tops world human rights abuses: Amnesty
Quote:
|
Re: Britain tops world human rights abuses: Amnesty
flavius read what amnesty say
then read the thread title Britain tops world human rights abuses: Amnesty observe how amnesty international's (very valid point [I really really don't need to point out that my professional work is heavily involved in correcting on a day to day basis these abuses amnesty has identified, or that the we drafted the european convention on human rights thereby setting a standard to which we hold ourselves: but hell i'm gonna!]) has been completely misused by the thread title. if you want a simple statement you can understand: do try to think before you post |
Re: Britain tops world human rights abuses: Amnesty
Texan for president!
Then again, look what happened the last time that was said. |
Re: Britain tops world human rights abuses: Amnesty
Quote:
Quote:
|
Re: Britain tops world human rights abuses: Amnesty
Quote:
|
Re: Britain tops world human rights abuses: Amnesty
Flav, you've gone completely nuts.
So having accepted that the thread is a trolling attempt, we should "get over it" and then what? Have a discussion about something else? |
Re: Britain tops world human rights abuses: Amnesty
Quote:
|
Re: Britain tops world human rights abuses: Amnesty
I say its a freaking human rights abuse that I have to read his crap.
Were is Amnesty Internation when you need em? :( |
Re: Britain tops world human rights abuses: Amnesty
Quote:
must you always be contrary? must we always be dismissed as simpletons in comparison to you? and really. darling. do you really really want me to type out (every single letter with my one poor tired finger) a totally unnecessary mass of words which show that everything isn't always black and white? really must i set out text and verse of quite what little texan was up to, how this was understood and seen as what it was. how links were misused. statements perverted? the whole sordid lot of it? why darling why do you feel the need to post snide little statements like the above unless your intent is to tire out my poor little finger with unnecessary and strainful typing? it just seems cruel. |
Re: Britain tops world human rights abuses: Amnesty
Quote:
it's always pride with you. the topic was not discussed because the topic was illusory. if you really want to discuss UK anti terror legislation then post a thread. I guarentee you that only I will post. and that you will find those posts incredibly detailed and incredibly dull.. you must try to understand the why as well as the what when someone says something it is terribly crass not to do admit! |
Re: Britain tops world human rights abuses: Amnesty
Quote:
Texan is one of the biggest idiots on this forum, but that does not justify fighting stupidity with stupidity. |
Re: Britain tops world human rights abuses: Amnesty
Quote:
it seems to simple little me that launching into a debate on what was really a side issue of the entire thread (the human rights abuses committed by the UK government which no doubt anger you as much as they anger me) is just going to excite the stupid. it may even inspire him to post more nonsense threads such as this. I just don't see how a throw away statement such as yours, which was directed at the true and frankly disgraceful UK human rights abuses, serves any purpose other than to inspire threads of such mind boggling stupidity. it's not even as though you and i disagree in substance. it's just that this sort of trolling nonsense, which anyone at all can see is a purile response to very valid criticism of the US, ought to be dealt with head on. I can't quite shake the feeling that texan has been told that his house is on fire and has responded by saying that you have a potentially dangerous loose wire and that you have responded by calling in an electriction rather than reminding him that his house is on fire. it is pure deflection. do admit! |
Re: Britain tops world human rights abuses: Amnesty
Quote:
The original post was crap. The title was stupid and wrong. The article was blatant propaganda that wasn't even worth discussing. The topic is a very valid one that we have in fact discussed many times on here before. However because the original post was so crap the discussion turned to how crap the original post was instead of the actual topic. If he had posted the actual amnesty international article in the first post and not pretended that Britain "tops world human rights abuses" I can guarantee we would have had a worthwhile discussion. It was blatant trolling so please stop trying to defend him. |
Re: Britain tops world human rights abuses: Amnesty
Quote:
The incorrect response is to turn it into a USA vs UK thread. That only seeks to excite the trolls, to use your words. Similarly, if you posted (a good or bad) thread on the problems of George W Bush, do you think a sensible rebuttal would be "Well Tony Blair is a **** too!"? Because that's the sort of thing Texan might do as he very much fits what I was talking about in my first post. |
Re: Britain tops world human rights abuses: Amnesty
i wonder what the reaction on this forum would have been, had he posted a link about human rights abuses in the US. no matter if from zimbabwe, north korea or iran, im pretty sure the reaction would have been different.
|
Re: Britain tops world human rights abuses: Amnesty
Quote:
(i dare say dear dda and s|k will be terribly upset by the implication of what you have written.) I always chose my pro nouns carefully. texan is an idiot. the bush administation is ghastly (and recently disgraceful) the entire reason that I post on an online forum is because I believe that there are things about britain which need improving. I believe the upper class needs a voice. not for itself. but it seems to me that the middle class has control over everything. no doubt you think and act as you do in preservation of the voice of the working classes. (i am digressing) this thread was awful and silly, texan is not america though he would like to pretend that he is: and he would like to label anyone who disagrees with him as 'not america'. your initial post didn't address these truths. do admit! |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:45. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2002 - 2018