Incomming stats prediction
This could be fun if Appocomaster give out the detailed inc stats this round again
I know the inc stats can be crippeled due to the constant leaving/joining Who was the top 5 incs in the 1/3 of the round, 2/3 and 3/3 of the round? My guess 1/3: 1. Conspiracy 2. Black-Flag 3. RainbowS 4. P3nguins 5. ND 2/3 1. Black-Flag 2. P3nguins 3. Conspiracy 4. Faceless 5. Furgion 3/3 1. P3nguins 2. Black-Flag 3. Furgion 4. RainbowS 5. Faceless - In total 1. Black-Flag 2. P3nguins 3. Conspiracy 4. RainbowS 5. Faceless |
Re: Incomming stats prediction
1/3:
1. p3nguins 2. Conspiracy 3. Rainbows 4. ND 5. Howling Rain 2/3 1. Black Flag 2. Conspiracy 3. p3nguins 4. Rainbows 5. ND 3/3 1. Black Flag 2. Faceless 3. p3nguins 4. Furgion 5. Faceless - In total 1. Black-Flag 2. Conspiracy 3. p3nguins 4. Furgion 5. Faceless |
Re: Incomming stats prediction
Bf for all 4
|
Re: Incomming stats prediction
Think I could agree with MM for once, except maybe first 1/3
|
Re: Incomming stats prediction
Quote:
|
Re: Incomming stats prediction
3/3
1. Black Flag 2. Conspiracy 3. p3nguins 4. Furgion 5. Faceless ty for pointing out :D |
Re: Incomming stats prediction
1/3:
P3n 2/3: Bf p3n 3/3: Bf With faceless and nd some place in the lower regions |
Re: Incomming stats prediction
"Man! I wonder if that coin landed heads or tails!"
|
Re: Incomming stats prediction
You ranked your own alliance to one of the allies with the least incomings troughout the round B-Butch3r. Yet your alliance ends #8 with only HowlingRain to compare memberwise beneath you.
I have to say that is extremly poor, your allie is not even close to the medium ranked allies. With your constant moaning of other poor hc`s and how your leaderstyle would revolutionize planetarion i have to say you fall into a category of boredom with zero achivements to show for your first round. Since its not possible to do any worse, the positive thing is that it can only go uphill from here. Over to the topic. I think Black-Flag has had the most incs troughout the round, followed by p3nguins. I think faceless and ct has had alot less incs than ppl think. Only small portions of concentrated incs. Congratulations goes to deserved winners p3ngu zoo! |
Re: Incomming stats prediction
Quote:
Ive also whined about the acceptance of cheating in the other alliances. Our goal was never this round to fight for univers dominance, and we will prolly not be going for #1 without staying within our own "moral code". Im sure no one will accuse uf of bottom feeding, or wanting to play the NAPtarion game this round. |
Re: Incomming stats prediction
More looking forward to seeing inc.stats on gals
|
Re: Incomming stats prediction
Quote:
|
Re: Incomming stats prediction
not hard to add their totals to the pie. 1:3 prolly had by far the most incs even without those two planets
|
Re: Incomming stats prediction
Quote:
|
Re: Incomming stats prediction
5:2 had some "garbage time" incs about 3 days before round ended, but the difference should still be substantial
|
Re: Incomming stats prediction
Quote:
Also seems that bf didnt have that much more inc over p3n infact RLY close |
Re: Incomming stats prediction
|
Re: Incomming stats prediction
No surprise there. 1:3 got incs pretty much every day all round long, a miracle that we came so close to winning top gal.
|
Re: Incomming stats prediction
In total
1. Black-Flag 2. P3nguins 3. Conspiracy 4. RainbowS 5. Faceless Was my prediction. Seems like i wasnt that far off. Ultores had more incs than RainbowS, but around the same average. 1:3 planets in 1:3 was behind around 16% of their incs, thats a big reason for them ending above both FL and RB in total incs. p3ng had slightly more incs than i expected, perhaps because Brasil seemed to like to attack them a lot |
Re: Incomming stats prediction
Quote:
|
Re: Incomming stats prediction
Quote:
Brasil how ever wernt with Ultores, and said in the EORC that they only went for p3ng planets mostly |
Re: Incomming stats prediction
yea our incs were pretty much black flag, HR, Rainbows and brasil crew.
In the final two weeks brasil spent a lot of time working on our top planets. I think the difference between us and BF which may have ultimately given us the win was pretty much 100% def to BF incoming. There were a couple of times that BF switched from hitting us, the first to hit faceless and we gained a 4mill gap and then the second time to hit CT where we opened up a 6mill gap before they started crashing everywhere. I have mentioned a few times if BF had kept their focus on us it would have been way closer. I think there were like 3 days of 0 incoming at one point. |
Re: Incomming stats prediction
Quote:
I think that most likely cost them their round tbh |
Re: Incomming stats prediction
I can sort of understand why to an extent. We were defending only their waves and our attacks were landing on them..they just didnt prioritise def.Its strange as in the first fight we had with them they prioritised vs us very well and we struggled to land them. They just kind of got confused later.
Hitting CT didnt cost them the round overall, I believe they wanted the XP which they needed from fat roid count. However they hadn't finished fighting us and then moved to hitting ct which resulted in just more incoming for them. IF bf hadnt of hit ct I expect a week later we would of had to hit ct to ensure we were still in a winning position. That decision never had to be made due to BF jumping them first with Ultores. For us that simply meant staying neutral with CT. Overall though our strategy was pretty simple this round, split BF from their previous round friendly block and keep hitting them until they were done with. In the end I think the sustained incoming just broken them down. Once they were moving to other alliances the others in their block who were landing us for free were pretty roid fat and full of score for us to open the gap. |
Re: Incomming stats prediction
Quote:
Our consistent incomings were from p3nguins & FURGION (FURGION hit us pretty much from about tick 300-1000 ptarget style). While I did not necessary agree with the decision for us to go on an aggressive offense, I understood the logic; due to the nature of the stats, it was difficult to hold our ground against multiple alliances for a longer period. We hit CT / Faceless for two reasons. The first and primary one was to stop a contender from winning, with the second to attempt to land XP. Our first night on CT, we landed big XP, bridging the gap between Black Flag & p3nguins from around 12m to just 2m in one night. However, come the second night on CT, they defended and prioritised against us well. Quote:
All in all, p3nguins played well and deserved the win. |
Re: Incomming stats prediction
Quote:
|
Re: Incomming stats prediction
Quote:
Nothing personal, but they are exelent targets for us, because have big planets to do big xp lands, and our attcks always landing there... maybe because they prioritized defs on others allys, like BF. |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:55. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2002 - 2018